Improved Transition Preemption Strategy for Signalized Intersections near At-Grade Railway Grade Crossing
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 8
Abstract
Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods for traffic signals located near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear vehicles from the crossing, secondary objectives such as maximizing pedestrian safety and minimizing vehicle delay are given less consideration and are often ignored completely. Consequently, the state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may result in pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings (IHRGCs). The state-of-the-art transition preemption strategy (TPS) algorithm was designed to reduce the probability that pedestrians would be endangered when the standard preemption was initiated by approaching trains. However, there is a possibility of failure because the algorithm is predicated on the assumption that train arrivals can be predicted with certainty. Given the fact that current architecture may not be adequate with respect to safety and efficiency, there is a definite need for research on how to improve traffic signal preemption strategies. In this paper, an improved transition preemption strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety is developed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves the operation of IHRGCs with respect to control delay while simultaneously reducing the probability of pedestrian conflicts associated with the standard preemption method and the TPS algorithm.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). (2004). Communications and signal manual, Landover, Md.
Cho, H. (2003). “Preemption strategy for traffic signals at intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Cho, H., and Rilett, L. R. (2003). “Forecasting train travel time.” Transportation Research Record 1844, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Eagle Traffic Control Systems. (1997). EPAC 300 actuated controller unit, PIM-177 product manual, Rev C.12. A Business Unit of SIEMENS Energy & Automation, Inc.
Engelbrecht, R., et al. (1999). “Advanced intersection controller response to railroad preemption.” Stage II Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2000). Manual on uniform traffic control devices, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Jacobson, M., et al. (1999). “Advanced intersection controller response to railroad preemption.” Stage I Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Jacobson, M., and Dudek, C. L., eds. (1997). An investigation of traffic signal preemption at railroad-highway grade crossings, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Marshall, P. S., and Berg, W. D. (1990). “Evaluation of railroad preemption capability of traffic signal controllers.” Transportation Research Record 1254, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 44–49.
Marshall, P. S., and Berg, W. D. (1991). “Guideline for railroad preemption at signalized intersections.” Proc., Conf. Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Part Three, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marshall, P. S., and Berg, W. D. (1997). “Design guidelines for railroad preemption as signalized intersections.” ITE J., 67(2), 20–25.
Milton, J. S., and Arnold, J. C. (1995). Introduction to probability and statistics, 3rd Ed., McGraw–Hill International Editions, New York.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1999). “Traffic signal operations near highway-rail grade crossing.” Synthesis of Highway Practice 271, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Venglar, S. (2000). “Advanced intersection controller response to railroad preemption.” Stage IV Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Venglar, S., et al. (2000). “Advanced intersection controller response to railroad preemption.” Stage III Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
VISSIM user’s manual, Version 3.5 (2000). PTV Planning Transport, Verkehr, AG.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 10, 2005
Accepted: Jan 27, 2006
Published online: Aug 1, 2007
Published in print: Aug 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.