Effect of Weigh-in-Motion System Measurement Errors on Load-Pavement Impact Estimation
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 1
Abstract
Weigh-in-motion (WIM) technology has found increasing application in the highway and transportation areas for traffic data collection for the purpose of highway capacity analysis, aiding enforcement and, most recently, pavement design. The measurement accuracy of a WIM scale is critical. There are numerous existing studies involving the measurement accuracy per se; however, the implications and effect of the accuracy in the context of pavement design have been rarely examined. To address this issue, two particular aspects are considered in this study. First, with traffic data obtained from WIM stations in Texas, axle load spectra are developed from both statistical data fit and load-pavement impact perspectives. Axle load spectra are shown to be captured best by mixed-lognormal distributions. Second, based on the first aspect, two scenarios are investigated by incorporating two types of errors into the load measurements: (1) A random error component due to the WIM scale intrinsic properties; and (2) a systematic error component due to the improper calibration of WIM system. The relationship between jointly varying measurement error levels and load-pavement impact estimation errors is established. It is demonstrated (and quantified) that both types of errors contribute to load-pavement impact estimation inaccuracy. The random error leads to overestimation of load-pavement impact. The results also show that WIM system calibration is of more importance because load-pavement impact estimation is more sensitive and significantly related to systematic error than random error. In addition, the estimated load-pavement impact is found to be more sensitive to overcalibration (positive bias) than undercalibration (negative bias) condition. In summary, the findings in this study provide an effective and efficient approach to evaluate WIM measurement errors in conjunction with load-pavement impact in pavement design and rehabilitation. The findings in this study could be further applied for the determination of adequate pavement design reliability standards. Results can also be useful to highway agencies in assessing and selecting WIM equipment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to thank the Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT) for providing the funds and support for this research through TxDOT Project No. 0-4510. Joe Leidy and Rich Rogers from the Construction and Materials Division are particularly acknowledged as well as Dr. German Claros from TxDOT Research and Implementation Office.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, Washington, D.C.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002). “Standard specification for highway weigh-in-motion (WIM) systems with user requirements and test method.” ASTM E 1318-02, Philadelphia.
Archilla, A. R., and Madanat, S. (2000). “Development of a pavement rutting model from experimental data.” J. Transp. Eng., 126(4), 291–299.
Belfield, K. M., and Souny-Slitine, N. (1999). “Truck weight limit enforcement technology applicable to NAFTA traffic along the Texas-Mexico border.” Research Rep. No. 167209-1. Center for Transportation Research, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Bergan, A. T., Berthelot, C. F., and Taylor, B. (1997). “Effect of weigh-in-motion accuracy on weight enforcement efficiency.” International Road Dynamics, Technical Paper, ⟨http://www.irdinc.com/english/html/tech-ppr/index.htm⟩ (June 1, 2005).
Carpenter, S. H. (1992). “Load equivalency factors and rutting rates for the AASHO road test.” Transportation Research Record. 1354, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Christison, J. T. (1986). Pavement responses to heavy vehicle test program—Part 2: Load equivalency factors, vehicle weights and dimensions study, Vol. 9, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa.
Davies, P., and Sommerville, F. (1987). “Calibration and accuracy testing of weigh-in-motion systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 122–126.
DeGroot, M. H., and Schervish, M. J. (2002). Probability and statistics, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1998). “WIM scale calibration: A vital activity for LTPP sites.” Techbrief No. FHWA-RD-98-104, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2001). Traffic monitoring guide, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Huang, Y. H. (2003). Pavement analysis and design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Humplick, F. (1992). “Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 26B(2), 135–154.
Izadmehr, B., and Lee, C. E. (1987a). “On-site calibration of weigh-in-motion systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 136–144.
Izadmehr, B., and Lee, C. E. (1987b). “Accuracy and tolerances of weigh-in-motion systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 127–l35.
Lee, C. E. (1998). “Factors that affect the accuracy of WIM systems.” Proc., 3rd National Conference on Weigh-in-Motion, St. Paul, Minn.
Middleton, D., and Crawford, J. A. (2001). “Evaluation of TxDOT’s traffic data collection and load forecasting process.” FHWA/TX-01/1801-1, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, Tex.
Mohammadi, J., and Shah, N. (1992). “Statistical evaluation of truck overloads.” J. Transp. Eng., 118(5), 651–665.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2005). “Mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” Research Project No. 1-37A, Washington, D.C., http://www.trb.org/mepdg/ (Aug. 8, 2005).
PAT Traffic Control Corporation, Inc. (1997). REPORTER, data evaluation software (program description and user’s manual), Chambersburg, PA.
Pont, D. J., Steven, B., and Alabaster, D. (2002). “The effect of mass limit changes on thin-surface pavement performance.” Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Delft, The Netherlands.
Prozzi, J. A., and Hong, F. (2005). “Optimum statistical characterization of weigh-in-motion data based on pavement impact.” Proc., 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (CD-Rom).
Timm, D., Tisdale, S. M., and Turochy, R. E. (2005). “Axle load spectra characterization by mixed distribution modeling.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(2), 83–88.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 1 • January 2007
Pages: 1 - 10
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 30, 2006
Accepted: Jul 26, 2006
Published online: Jan 1, 2007
Published in print: Jan 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.