Prohibiting Left-Turn Movements at Mid-Block Unsignalized Driveways: Simulation Analysis
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 4
Abstract
In recent years, there has been major interest in “access management” as a new response to the ubiquitous traffic congestion problem. Among the different access management strategies is the idea of prohibiting left-turn movements at unsignalized driveways. In this study, the Corridor Simulation traffic simulation model was used to evaluate the operational impacts of different left-turn treatments at mid-block intersections on different classes of roadway facilities. The study also examined the impact of varying the arterial and driveway volume on the effectiveness of restricting direct left turns and providing alternative movements. Three different alternatives were considered for left-turn treatments at mid-block unsignalized intersections: (1) no restriction of direct left turns from or to driveways; (2) no direct left turns in or out of driveways and diverted traffic makes a U-turn at the next intersections; and (3) no direct left turns in or out of driveways and diverted traffic makes a U-turn at mid-block. Two additional cases were also evaluated: a jug handle design, and no direct left turns in or out of all-but-one driveways (concentrated left turn). The results show very little operational difference between the no restrictions on direct left turns alternative versus the restrictions with the U-turn alternative movements from site to site. The jughandle design appeared to be a superior alternative for accommodating left-turn deterred traffic for multilane divided and undivided sites compared to mid-block or intersection U-turns. In addition, it is shown that the concentrated left turn appears to be an excellent solution for improving traffic flow conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bloomberg, L., and Dale, J. (2000). “A comparison of the vissim and CORSIM traffic simulation models on a congested network.” Proc., 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD ROM).
Chowdhury, M., Derov, N., and Tan, P. (2003). “Evaluating the effects of prohibiting left turns and the resulting u-turn movement.” Final Rep. Prepared for the Ohio Department of Transportation, Ohio.
Dissanayake, S., Lu, J. J., Castillo, N., and Yi, P. (2002). “Should direct left turn from driveways be avoided? “A Safety Perspective.” ITE J., June, 26–29.
Gluck, J., Levinson, H., and Stover, V. (1999). “Impacts of access management techniques.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 420, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
ITT Systems and Science Corporation. (1998). CORSIM user’s manual, Colorado Springs, Colo.
Koepke, F. J., and Levinson, H. L. (1992). “Access management guidelines for activity centers.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 348, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Spring, G., Virkler, M., Zhao, K., and Jitta, S. (2003). “A tool for assessing rural median crossover designs.” Proc., 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD ROM).
Xu, L. (2001). “Right-turn followed by u-turns versus direct left turns: A comparison of safety issues.” ITE J., 71, 36–43.
Zhou, H., Lu, J. J., Castillo, N., and Williams, K. M. (2000). “Operational effects of a right turn plus u-turn treatment as an alternative to a direct left turn movement from a driveway.” Proc., 4th Annual Access Management Conf., Portland, Ore.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 8, 2003
Accepted: Feb 2, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.