CORSIM-Based Simulation Approach to Evaluation of Direct Left Turn versus Right Turn Plus U-Turn from Driveways
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 1
Abstract
Right turn plus U-turn at median openings as an alternative to direct left turn has been considered important issue in access management. The motivation behind using this strategy comes from the consideration of safety as well as from traffic operational performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the operational performances of direct left turn and right turn plus U-turn through simulation. This study attempted to figure out under what traffic conditions replacing a direct left turn with a right turn plus U-turn would be beneficial from an operational point of view. CORSIM, a combination of FRESIM and NETSIM, was selected as the analytical tool in the study due to its strong capability in road network evaluation and its animation display function. A total of six sites were selected to do the field data collection. The delay and travel time were used as the measures of effectiveness (MOE) in evaluating the operational performance of direct left turn (DLT) and right turn plus U-turn (RT+UT). The site-specific simulation models for the six sites were developed using CORSIM. Each model was calibrated based on the field data. The comparisons between DLT and RT+UT in terms of the delay and travel time have been conducted under different levels of traffic volume. The simulation results showed that, with an increase in the through-traffic volume on the major road, the delay as well as the travel time of DLT were higher than those of RT+UT. This information is very useful for decision makers in determining what kind of median opening will be applicable under the given traffic conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Benekohal, R. F. et al. (1994). “Variability analysis of traffic simulation outputs: practical approach for TRAF-NETSIM.” Transportation Research Record 1457, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 198–207.
Gluck, J., et al. (1999). “Impacts of access management techniques.” NCHRP Rep. 420, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Khasnabis, S., et al. (1996). “NETSIM-based approach to evaluation of bus preemption strategies.” Transportation Research Record 1554, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 80–89.
Lee, D. H., et al. (2001). “Parameter calibration for PARAMICS using genetic algorithm.” Proc., 80th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Paper 01-2399.
Neelamkavil, F. (1987). Computer simulation and modeling, Wiley, New York.
Prevedouros, P. D., et al. (1998). “Simulation of large freeway/arterial network with CORSIM, INTEGRATION, and WATSim.” Proc., 78th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Wong, S. Y. (1991). “Capacity and level of service by simulation: A case study of TRAF-NETSIM.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 11, 2002
Accepted: Feb 21, 2003
Published online: Dec 15, 2003
Published in print: Jan 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.