Distributing Superelevation to Maximize Highway Design Consistency
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 2
Abstract
Several methods for distributing highway superelevation (e) and side friction (f ) have been presented by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Based on a subjective analysis, AASHTO has recommended the curvilinear distribution method. This paper presents an objective method that distributes superelevation using mathematical optimization. A safety margin is defined as the difference between the maximum limiting speed (corresponding to and the design speed. The objective function of the model minimizes the overall variation of the safety margin along the highway (aggregate analysis) or the individual variations of the safety margin between adjacent curves (disaggregate analysis). Both objectives maximize highway design consistency. The model includes constraints related to the maximum side friction, minimum and maximum superelevations, centripetal ratio, and safety margin. The e and f distributions can be discrete values with no specific mathematical shape or follow a general quadratic curve with a parameter determined by the optimization model. Application of the model was illustrated using two examples, and the results show that the design consistency obtained by the model is considerably better than that obtained by the AASHTO methods.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2001). “A policy on geometric design of highways and streets.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
Easa, S. M.(1999). “Discussion of superelevation, side friction, and roadway consistency, by Alan Nicholson.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(5), 411–418.
Gibreel, G., Easa, S., Hassan, Y., and El-Dimeery, I.(1999). “State of the art of geometric design consistency.” J. Transp. Eng., 125(4), 305–313.
Kanellaidis, G.(1996). “Human factors in highway geometric design.” J. Transp. Eng., 122(1), 59–66.
Krammes, R. A., et al. (1995). “Horizontal alignment design consistency for rural two-lane highways.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-94-034, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Lamm, R., Choueiri, E. M., and Mailaender, T. (1992). “Traffic safety on two continents—a ten-year analysis of human and vehicular involvements.” Proc., Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Gothenburg, Sweden, 18–20.
Lunenfeld, H., and Alexander, G. (1990). “A user’s guide to positive guidance.” Rep. No. FHWA-SA-90-017, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Naatanen, R., and Summala, H. (1976). Road user behavior and traffic accidents, American Elsevier, New York.
Nicholson, A.(1998). “Superelevation, side friction, and roadway consistency.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(5), 411–418.
Rural road design: Guide to geometric design of rural roads. (1993). Austroads, Sydney, Australia.
Schrage, L. (1991a). User’s manual for LINDO, Scientific Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Schrage, L. (1991b). LINDO: An optimization modeling system, Scientific Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Summala, H.(1988). “Risk control is not risk adjustment: The zero-risk theory of driver behavior and its implications.” Ergonomics, 31(4), 491–506.
Winston, W. L. (1994). Operations research: Applications and algorithms, Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 17, 2001
Accepted: Dec 19, 2001
Published online: Feb 14, 2003
Published in print: Mar 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.