Cost-Effectiveness of Joint and Crack Sealing: Synthesis of Practice
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 6
Abstract
The sealing and resealing of joints and cracks in pavements is assumed to be an important component of pavement maintenance. If performed effectively and timely, sealing may retard pavement deterioration and prolong pavement life. Historically, sealing and resealing has been an accepted practice by state highway agencies (SHAs) but this practice has recently been challenged by research. Additionally, studies that provide a clear quantitative defense that joint/crack sealing is cost effective are few in number and limited in scope. Millions of dollars are spent annually by SHAs to accomplish joint and crack sealing with no quantitative evidence to justify the expenditure. The sealing operations are conducted simply because the “industry” assumes the benefits of sealing outweigh the costs. The objective of this research was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of joint/crack sealing specifically in relation to pavement performance. This report represents a synthesis of practice (extensive literature review and survey of practice) used for determining whether further research was needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of crack/joint sealing in Indiana. Ultimately, it led to the development of a comprehensive field study that the Indiana Department of Transportation is sponsoring.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chong, G. J. ( 1989). “Rout and seal cracks in flexible pavement—A cost-effective preventive maintenance procedure.” Rep. No. 890412, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
2.
Chong, G. J., and Phang, W. A. ( 1988). “Improved preventive maintenance: Sealing cracks in flexible pavements in cold regions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1205, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
3.
Dunn, K. H. ( 1987). “The effect of sealed vs. unsealed joints on the performance of jointed PCC pavement—A synthesis.” Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis.
4.
Evart, M. J., and Bennett, A. R. ( 1998). “Bituminous crack filling test section on US-10 near Evart.” Rep. No. R-1356, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, Mich.
5.
Fang, C., et al. ( 2000). “Cost effectiveness of joint/crack sealing phase I.” Joint Transp. Res. Program Interim Rep. on Proj. SPR-2334, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.
6.
Freeman, R. B., and Johnson, D. ( 1999). “Cost-effectiveness of crack sealing materials and techniques for asphalt pavements.” FHWA/MT-98-007/8127, Western Transp. Inst., Montana State University, Bozeman, Mont.
7.
Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. ( 1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Fla.
8.
Hawkins, B. K., Ioannides, A. M., and Minkarah, I. A. ( 2000). “To seal or not to seal: Construction of a field experiment to resolve an age-old dilemma.” Transp. Res. Rec. Preprint Paper No. 00-0552, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
9.
Morian, D. A., Epps, J. A., and Gibson, S. D. ( 1997). “Pavement treatment effectiveness, 1995 SPS-3 and SPS-4 site evaluation.” Interim Rep., Nichols Consulting Engineers Chtd., Reno, Nev.
10.
Morian, D. A., Gibson, S. D., and Epps, J. A. ( 1998). “Concrete pavement maintenance treatment performance review: SPS-4 5 year data analysis.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-97-155, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
11.
Morian, D. A., and Stoffels, S. ( 1998). “Joint seal practices in the United States—Observation and consideration.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1627, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
12.
Ponniah. J. E., and Kennepohl, F. J. ( 1996). “Crack sealing in flexible pavements: A life-cycle cost analysis.” Transportation Research Record 1129, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
13.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D.-Y., and Kennedy, T. W. ( 1996). Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction, 2nd Ed., National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, Md.
14.
Rutkowski, T. S. ( 1990). “Joint sealant study, interim report.” Rep. No. WI-02-90, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis.
15.
Rutkowski, T. S. ( 1998). “Evaluation of asphaltic concrete crack sealing.” Rep. No. WI-08-96, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis.
16.
Rutkowski, T. S., Shober, S. F., and Schmeidlin, R. B. ( 1998). “Performance evaluation of drained pavement structures.” Rep. No. WI/SPR-04-98, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis.
17.
Sharaf, E. A., and Sinha, K. C. ( 1986). “Energy saving from increased preventive maintenance on Indiana highways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1102, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
18.
Shober, S. F. ( 1997). “The great unsealing—A perspective on portland cement concrete joint sealing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1597, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
19.
Techniques for pavement rehabilitation—Reference manual. (1998). 6 Ed., FHWA/HI-98-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
20.
Ward, D. R. ( 1993). “Evaluation of crack sealing performance on Indiana's asphalt concrete surfaced pavements.” Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, Ind.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 6 • December 2000
Pages: 521 - 529
History
Received: Apr 10, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2000
Published in print: Dec 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.