Impact Finite-Element Analysis of Slip-Base Sign Support Mechanism
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 2
Abstract
The slip-base design mechanism is used to support signs and luminaries in highways and is designed to break away in crashes with vehicles. This mechanism is intended to minimize occupant injuries by providing reduced resistance to the impacting vehicles. The slip-base mechanism could be sensitive to many design parameters. Conventional design and evaluation of safety performance of these systems by trial and error and crash testing is inefficient, as well as cost prohibitive. Therefore, finite-element (FE) models that can accurately simulate the performance of the slip-base system in various crash scenarios are of essential value. This paper describes dynamic FE models of a slip-base sign support system and its crash performance with vehicles using DYNA3D code. The geometric features, as well as several physical phenomena of components of the slip-base mechanism, e.g., sliding friction, clamping forces, bolt-plate interactions, and plate rupture, are modeled and verified in simulation. The FE modeling methods for the required features are described in detail. A validated model of Bogie and its honeycomb material is used as the impacting vehicle. FE crash simulations of Bogie with flexible honeycomb nose impacting the slip-base sign support are validated using the corresponding instrumented crash tests. The simulation model reveals the correct behavior of the break away system response upon impact. The slipping mechanism and Bogie acceleration and velocity responses are accurate as compared with actual crash test results. The FE approach and this validated model can be exercised in numerous crash scenarios for design optimization of other variations of slip-base systems in size, orientation, etc., or for performance evaluation of impacts with various vehicles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Basu, S., and Haghighi, A. (1988). “Numerical analysis of roadside design (NARD) Volume IV: Validation procedure manual.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-88-213, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1–32.
2.
Benson, D. J., and Hallquist, J. O. (1986). “The application of DYNA3D in large scale crashworthiness calculations.” Proc., Int. Computers in Engrg. Conf., ASME, Boston.
3.
Benson, D. J., Hallquist, J. O., and Stillman, D. W. (1985). “DYNA3D, INGRID, and TAURUS—An integrated, interactive software system for crashworthiness engineering.” Proc., Int. Computers in Engrg. Conf., ASME, Boston.
4.
Brown, C. M. ( 1995). “Testing of the Oregon multidirectional slip-base sign support systems.” Federal Outdoor Impact Laboratory, Test numbers: 950007, 950009, FHWA Contract No. DTFH61-91-Z-00002, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
5.
Cofie, E., and Ray, M. H. (1995). “Finite element model of a small automobile impacting a rigid pole.” Rep. FHWA-RD-94-151, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
6.
Eskandarian, A., Bedewi, N. E., Kan, C. D., and Marzougui, D. (1996). “Failure analysis of highway small sign support systems in crashes using impact finite element models.” Proc., 29th Int. Symp on Automotive Technol. and Automation (SATA), Road and Vehicle Safety, Florence, Italy, 395–402.
7.
Eskandarian, A., Marzougui, D., and Bedewi, N. E. (1997). “Finite element model and validation of a surrogate crash test vehicle for impacts with roadside objects.” Int. J. of Crashworthiness Res., 2(3), 239–257.
8.
Frank, T., and Gruber, K. (1991). “Numerical simulation of frontal impact and front offset collisions.” Cray Channels, Winter Issue, 2–6.
9.
Hancock, K.L., and MacHale, G. M. (1990). “Testing of small and large sign supports.” Vol. I and II, Rep. under Federal Highway Administration Contract No. DTFH61-89-C-00100, Scientex Corp.
10.
Le-Tha, H., and Nalepa, E. ( 1988). “Crash simulation of vehicles, using the explicit FE methods.” Finite Element News, Issue 2.
11.
Perfect, S., and Logan, R. (1994). “Evaluation of the Honda Civic based FE model.” Transp. Res. Board Annu. Meeting, Presentation at Computer Simulation of Impact with Roadside Safety Features, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
12.
Ross, H. E. Jr., Siking, D. L., Zimmer, R. A. and Michie, J. D. (1993). “Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway appurtenances.” Rep. 350, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
13.
Toyoma, A., Hatano, K., and Murakami, E. ( 1992). “Numerical analysis of vehicle frontal crash phenomena.” Analytical Modeling and Occupant Protection Technologies, SAE, 143–154.
14.
Wekezer, J. W., Oskard, M, Logan, R., and Zywicz, E. (1993). “Vehicle impact simulation.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 119(4), 598–617.
15.
Whirley, R. G., and Englemenn, B. ( 1993). “Automatic contact in DYNA3D for vehicle crashworthiness.” Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection in Transp. Systems, AMD-Vol. 169/BED-Vol. 25, ASME, 15–29.
16.
Whirley, R. G., and Hallquist, J. O. (1991). “DYNA3D, a nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics—User manual.” Rep. No. UCRL-MA-107254, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 2 • March 2000
Pages: 143 - 153
History
Received: Jun 12, 1998
Published online: Mar 1, 2000
Published in print: Mar 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.