Assessing Expected Accuracy of Probe Vehicle Travel Time Reports
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 6
Abstract
The use of probe vehicles to provide estimates of link travel times has been suggested as a means of obtaining travel times within signalized networks for use in advanced travel information systems. Past research in the literature has provided contradictory conclusions regarding the expected accuracy of these probe-based estimates, and consequently has estimated different levels of market penetration of probe vehicles required to sustain accurate data within an advanced traveler information system. This paper examines the effect of sampling bias on the accuracy of the probe estimates. An analytical expression is derived on the basis of queuing theory to prove that bias in arrival time distributions and/or in the proportion of probes associated with each link departure turning movement will lead to a systematic bias in the sample estimate of the mean delay. Subsequently, the potential for and impact of sampling bias on a signalized link is examined by simulating an arterial corridor. The analytical derivation and the simulation analysis show that the reliability of probe-based average link travel times is highly affected by sampling bias. Furthermore, this analysis shows that the contradictory conclusions of previous research are directly related to the presence or absence of sample bias.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Boyce, D., Hicks, J., and Sen, A. K. (1991a). “In-vehicle navigation system requirements for monitoring link travel times in a dynamic route guidance system.” Proc., 70th Annu. Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board.
2.
Boyce, D., Kirson, A., and Schofer, J. (1991b). “Design and implementation of ADVANCE: The Illinois dynamic navigation and route guidance program.” Proc., Vehicle Navigation and Information Sys. Conf., Vol. 1, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 415–426.
3.
Hurdle, V. F. (1984). “Signalized intersection delay models—A primer for the uninitiated.” Transp. Res. Rec. 971, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 96–105.
4.
Sen, A., Soot, S., Ligas, J., and Tian, X. (1997a). “Arterial link travel time estimation: Probes, detectors and assignment-type models.” Proc., 70th Annu. Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board, Preprint No. 970943.
5.
Sen, A., Thakuriah, P., Zhu, X., and Karr, A. (1997b). “Frequency of probe reports and variance of travel time estimates.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 123(4), 290–297.
6.
Srinivasan, K. K., and Jovanis, P. P. (1996). “Oversaturation delay estimates with consideration of peaking.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1537, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 15–22.
7.
Teply, S., Allingham, D. I., Richardson, D. B., and Stephenson, B. W. ( 1995). Canadian capacity guide for signalized intersections. Institute of Transportation Engineers, District 7, Canada.
8.
Turner, M. S., and Holdener, D. J. (1995). “Probe vehicle sample sizes for real-time information: The Houston experience.” Proc., Vehicle Navigation and Information Sys. (VNIS) Conf., IEEE, New York, 3–9.
9.
Van Aerde, M., Hellinga, B., Baker, M., and Rakha, H. (1996). “INTEGRATION: Overview of simulation features.” Proc., 75th Annu. Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
10.
Van Aerde, M., Hellinga, B., Yu, L., and Rakha, H. (1993). “Vehicle probes as real-time ATMS sources of dynamic O-D and travel time data.” Large urban systems—Proc., ATMS Conf., 207–230.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Dec 23, 1998
Published online: Nov 1, 1999
Published in print: Nov 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.