Captivity Revisited
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 1
Abstract
Captivity to a choice is an aspect of the choice process that is not well understood in the transportation area. The current context of understanding of this phenomenon is superficial and covers only being physically constrained to a single choice. However, there are many related concepts and behavioral phenomena, as discussed in various other fields, such as brand or service loyalty, brand switching, resistance to change, and habit formation, that can contribute to the formation of some degree of captivity. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of these phenomena is becoming important to the transportation industry because of high levels of competition. For instance, it has become important for airline companies to develop customer loyalty to survive in the industry, after the airline industry in the United States was deregulated in 1978. The main aim of this work, therefore, is to develop a broad framework for describing the fundamentals of captivity, i.e., what, how, and when the underlying processes bring about captivity, and to form a theoretical basis for it. After presenting a framework within which captivity can be described, a way of handling it through “stated choices” is tested by means of a modeling effort using intercity travel mode choice data from Saudi Arabia. The travel mode choice models calibrated for two trip purposes indicate the feasibility of this method. Finally, conclusions and the areas that need further research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Al-Ahmadi, H. M., Ergün, G., Al-Senan, S. H., and Ratrout, N. T. ( 1996). “Development of a national intercity modal split model for Saudi Arabia.” Final Rep., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
2.
Ben-Akiva, M. ( 1977). “Choice models with simple choice set generating process.” Working Paper, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R. ( 1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand . MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T., and Shiroishi, F. ( 1989). “Analysis of the reliability of stated preference data in estimating mode choice models.” Selected Proc., 5th WCTR, Yokohama, Japan, Vol. 4, 263–277.
5.
Bordley, R. F. ( 1990). “The dogit model is applicable even without perfectly captive buyers.” Transp. Res.—B, 24B(4), 315–323.
6.
Bruning, E. R. ( 1995). “The role of consumer ethnocentrism in the choice of international air carrier.” J. Transp. Res. Forum, 34(2), 1–12.
7.
Clarke, M. I., Dix, M. C., and Goodwin, P. B. ( 1982). “Some issues of dynamics in forecasting travel behavior—A discussion paper.” Transp., 11, 153–172.
8.
Colombo, R., and Morrison, D. ( 1989). “A brand-switching model with implications for marketing strategies.” Marketing Sci., 8(1), 89–99.
9.
Gaudry, M. J. I. ( 1980). “Dogit and logit models of travel mode choice in Montreal.” Can. J. Economics, 13(2), 269–279.
10.
Gaudry, M. J. I., and Deganais, M. G. ( 1979). “The dogit model.” Transp. Res.—B, 13B, 105–111.
11.
Goodwin, P. ( 1977). “Habit and hysteresis in mode choice.” Urban Studies, 14(1), 95–8.
12.
Hirobata, Y., and Kawakami, S. ( 1990). “Modeling disaggregate behavioral modal switching models based on intention data.” Transp. Res.—B, 24B(1), 15–25.
13.
Jacoby, J., and Chestnut, R. W. ( 1978). Brand loyalty measurement and management, Wiley, New York.
14.
Kawakami, S., and Hirobata, Y. ( 1984). “Analyses on changes of modal choice based on new behavioral hypotheses.” Transp. Policy and Decision Making, 2, 389–406.
15.
Lee, M., and Cunningham, L. F. ( 1996). “Customer loyalty in the airline industry.” Transp. Quarterly, 50(2), 57–72.
16.
Manski, C. ( 1977). “The structure of random utility models.” Theory and Decision, 8, 229–254.
17.
Onkvist, S., and Shaw, J. J. ( 1994). Consumer behavior, McMillan College Publishing, New York.
18.
Stopher, P. R. (1980). “Captivity and choice travel—Behavior models.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 106(4), 427–435.
19.
Stopher, P. R., and Meyburg, A. H. ( 1979). Survey sampling and multivariate analysis for social scientists and engineers . Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
20.
Swait, J., and Ben-Akiva, M. ( 1985). “Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation.” Transp. Res.—B, 21B, 91–102.
21.
Swait, J., and Ben-Akiva, M. ( 1986). “Constraints on individual travel behavior in a Brazilian city.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1085, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 75–85.
22.
Swait, J., and Ben-Akiva, M. ( 1987). “Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation.” Transp. Res.—B, 21B(2), 91–102.
23.
William, H., and Ortuzar, J. ( 1982). “Behavioral theories of dispersion and misspecification of travel demand models.” Transp. Res.—B, 16B, 167–219.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 1 • January 1999
Pages: 1 - 7
History
Received: Mar 12, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 1999
Published in print: Jan 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.