Evaluation of Count Location Selection Methods for Estimation of O-D Matrices
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 4
Abstract
Origin-destination (O-D) trip matrix estimation from traffic count surveys is regarded as the most economical and effective methodology in road network analysis for transport planning and traffic management. Despite the numerous mathematical estimation techniques previously developed, the fundamental procedure of selecting count locations itself is a prime determinant in the quality of the ultimate estimation and deserves more in-depth exploration. In this paper, some existing methods being adopted in practice are reviewed. Two basic rules are established based on previous works and are formulated in a linear programming model to determine the best survey locations for O-D estimation. However, technical problems will be incurred when applied to a large network with huge number of variables involved. The proposed maximal O-D selection method is proved to provide results with a comparable level of reliability, and a sensitivity test is conducted with different objective functions to verify this proposed strategic algorithm. This paper examines the efficiency of additional link counts for O-D estimation and recommends an efficient data collection method. The models and algorithms are illustrated with numerical examples.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“1992 annual traffic census.” Transport Department of Hong Kong (1993).
2.
Bell, M. G. H.(1983). “The estimation of an origin-destination matrix from traffic counts.”Transp. Sci., 17, 198–217.
3.
Bell, M. G. H. (1991). “The estimation of origin-destination matrices by constrained generalised least squares.”Transp. Res., 25B(1), 13–22.
4.
Hall, M. D., Van Vliet, D., and Willumsen, L. G.(1980). “SATURN—A simulation-assignment mode for the evaluation of traffic management schemes.”Traffic Engrg. and Control, London, U.K., 21, 168–176.
5.
Han, A. F., and Sullivan, E. C. (1983). “Trip table synthesis for CBD networks: Evaluation of the LINKOD model.”Transp. Res. Record 944, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 106–112.
6.
Lam, W. H. K., and Lo, H. P.(1990). “Accuracy of O-D estimates from traffic counts.”Traffic Engrg. and Control, London, U.K., 31(6), 358–367.
7.
Logie, M., and Hynd, A. (1990). “MVESTM matrix estimation.”Traffic Engrg. and Control, 31(8/9), 454–459; also 31(10), 534–549.
8.
Maher, M. J. (1983). “Inferences on trip matrices from observations on link volumes: A Bayesian statistical approach.”Transp. Res., 17B(6), 435–447.
9.
Van Vliet, D., and Hall, M. D. (1993). SATURN version 9.2, A user's maual—Universal version.
10.
Van Zuylen, H. J., and Willumsen, L. G. (1980). “The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts.”Transp. Res., 14B(13), 218–293.
11.
Yang, H., and Zhou, J. (1998). “Optimal traffic counting locations for original-destination matrix estimation.”Transp. Res., 32B(2), 109–126.
12.
Yang, H., Iida, Y., and Sasaki, T. (1991). “An analysis of the reliability of an origin-destination trip matrix estimated from traffic counts.”Transp. Res., 25B(5), 351–363.
13.
Yim, P. K. N., and Lam, W. H. K. (1996). “Evaluation of the count location selection methods for the estimation of O-D matrices from traffic counts.”Proc., First Conf. of Hong Kong Soc. for Transp. Studies, 255–268.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1998
Published in print: Jul 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.