Ordered Probability Modeling of Seat Belt Usage
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper develops a new method to examine the factors that influence driver's seat belt usage. A binary logit model of the driver's beliefs in the effectiveness of seat belts is first developed. The seat belt beliefs probability is then used as an input to a seat belt usage model. Unlike the traditional binary approach, this model is formulated using the ordered probability approach, which allows three levels of choices of seat belt usage (rarely, sometimes, and frequently). The seat belt usage model was estimated separately for urban (short) trips and rural intercity (long) trips using a survey of drivers (385 interviews) conducted in Amman, Jordan. The model results show that drivers with homes located in rural or suburban areas, female drivers, and old drivers strongly believe in the effectiveness of seat belts. The presence of children in the household, vehicle ownership, and serious accident involvement also positively influence seat belt beliefs. Seat belt usage is affected by trip type, distance traveled, past involvement in traffic accidents, time of buckling up the seat belt, and extent of seat belt beliefs. Seat belt usage varies with the type of environment (rural or urban). Although older drivers strongly believe in seat belt effectiveness, their seat belt usage frequency is higher for rural trips than for urban trips. For work driving, the usage frequency was lower for urban trips than for rural trips. However, for both trip environments, the usage frequency is influenced greatly by the seat belt beliefs. The empirical results underscore the appropriateness of the proposed seat belt usage model and provide more insights into the pertinent factors affecting seat belt usage.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
2.
Chatterjee, A.(1991). “Safety belt use in Tennessee.”Inst. of Transp. Engrs. J., 61(1), 23–27.
3.
Colborne, H. V., et al. (1968). “Acceptance of safety belts (4).”Tech. Note 302, Studies of Motorist Attitudes and Opinions about Safety Belts. Road Res. Lab., Ministry of Transport, Crowthorne Berkshire, U.K.
4.
Council, F. M.(1969). “Seat belts: a follow-up study of their use under normal driving conditions.”J. Safety Res., 1(3), 127–136.
5.
Evans, L. (1986). “The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 18(3) 229–241.
6.
Fhaner, G., and Hane, M.(1973). “Seat belts: factors influencing their use: a literature survey.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 5(1), 27–43.
7.
Fhaner, G., and Hane, M.(1974). “Seat belts: relations between beliefs, attitude, and use.”J. of Appl. Psychology, 59(4), 472–482.
8.
Fhaner, G., and Hane, M.(1975). “Seat belts: changing usage by changing beliefs.”J. of Appl. Psychology, 60(5), 589–598.
9.
Fhaner, G., and Hane, M.(1979). “Seat belts: opinion effects of law-induced use.”J. of Appl. Psychology, 64(2), 205–212.
10.
Fockler S. K., and Cooper(1990). “Situational characteristics of safety belt use.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 22(2), 109–118.
11.
Garbacs, C.(1991). “Impact of New Zealand seat belt law.”Economic Inquiry, 29, 310–316.
12.
Greene, W. (1993). Econometric analysis. Macmillan, New York, N.Y.
13.
Jonah, B. A., and Dawson, N. E.(1982). “Predicting reported seat belt use from attitudinal and normative factors.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 14(4), 305–309.
14.
Kristiansen, C. M.(1985). “Seat belt legislation and seat belt use: effects on differences related to sex, social class and smoking.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 17(1), 75–78.
15.
Langlie, J. K.(1977). “Social networks, health beliefs, and preventive health behaviour.”J. of health Social Behaviour, 18(3), 244–260.
16.
Lassarre, S.(1986). “The introduction of the variables traffic volume, speed and belt-wearing into a predictive model of the severity of accidents.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 8(2), 129–134.
17.
Lund, A. K. (1986). “Voluntary seat belt use among U.S. drivers: geographic, socioeconomic, and demographic variations.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 18(1) 43–50.
18.
Mannering, F., Kim, S. G., Barfield, W., and Ng, L.(1994). “Statistical analysis of commuter's route, mode, and departure time flexibility and the influence of traffic information.”Transp. Res., Part C, 2(1), 35–47.
19.
Mannering, F., and Winston, C. (1987). “Recent automobile occupant safety proposals.”Blind intersection. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 69–88.
20.
McCarthy, P. S. (1986). “Seat belt usage rates: a test of Peltzman's hypothesis.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 18(6) 425–438.
21.
McElvey, W., and Zavoina, R.(1975). “A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables.”J. of Math. Sociology, 4(2), 103–120.
22.
Noland, R. B. (1995). Perceived risk and modal choice: risk compensation in transportation systems. Accident Anal. and Prevention, 27(4), 503–521.
23.
Peltzman, S.(1975). “The effects of automobile safety regulation.”J. of Political Economy, 83, 677–625.
24.
Preusser, D. F.(1987). “The effect of New York's seat belt use law on teenage drivers.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 19(2), 73–80.
25.
Preusser, D. F. (1988). “Belt use by high-risk drivers before and after New York's seat belt use law.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 20(4) 245–250.
26.
Preusser, D. F.(1991). “Characteristics of belted and unbelted drivers.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 23(6), 475–482.
27.
Reinfurt, D. W.(1990). “Evaluating the North Caroline safety belt wearing law.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 22(3), 197–210.
28.
Robertson, L. S.(1972). “Factors associated with observed safety belt use.”J. of Health Social Behaviour, 13(1), 18–24.
29.
Rock, S. M. (1993). “Risk compensation and the Illinois seat belt use law.”Paper presented at the 72nd Annu. Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
30.
Wagenaar, A. C., and Margolis, L. H.(1990). “Effects of a mandatory safety belt law on hospital admissions.”Accident Anal. and Prevention, 22(22), 253–261.
31.
Williams, A. F., et al. (1983). Voluntary seat belt use among high school students. Accident Anal. and Prevention, 15(2) 161–165.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 124 • Issue 3 • May 1998
Pages: 271 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1998
Published in print: May 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.