Impact of Commuter-Rail Services in Toronto Region
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
Ridership of the commuter-rail system that was implemented in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) in 1967 increased at an annual, average compound rate of 11.4 until 1989. Demand has leveled substantially during 1990–94 and has averaged only 2.1 per year, which probably reflects the suburbanization of employment. Urban economic theory is used to explain the way in which central-business-district (CBD) employees respond differently to suburban commuter-rail services and rapid transit services, mainly serving the inner and intermediate suburbs. Travel data collected in 1986 and 1991 confirmed the effects suggested by the theory. Commuter-rail passengers are drawn from the larger suburban households, living principally in single-family houses, and commuter-rail passengers are more sensitive to access and egress distances than subway passengers. Policies that improve the quality of access and egress components of commuting trips from the suburbs stimulate passenger demand. Also, land-use policies that promote high-density, residential development at suburban commuter-rail stations are unlikely to contribute significantly to commuter-rail demand, and the lakeshore commuter-rail line that has been in service since 1967 has not had a significant impact on residential sorting and on the generation of additional demands.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chartier, E. G. (1992). “Locational and travel behaviour characteristics of GO rail commuters,” MS thesis, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
2.
DeGraw, R. (1994). “Regional rail: The Philadelphia story.”Transp. Res. Record 1433, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 107–112.
3.
Gorys, J., McLeod, M., and Williams, F. (1991). “GO rail 1989 survey results.”Transp. Res. Record 1308, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 26–32.
4.
Hutchinson, B. G.(1986). “Structural changes in commuting in the Toronto region 1971–1981.”Transport Rev., 6(4), 311–329.
5.
Matoff, T. G. (1994). “Regional rail in a low density context.”Transp. Res. Record 1433, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 89–98.
6.
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. (1994). “1993 GO rail passenger survey.”Transp. Demand Forecasting Ofc., Downsview, Ontario, Canada.
7.
Nowlan, D. M., and Stewart, G. (1991). “Downtown population growth and commuting trips: Recent experience in Toronto.”J. Am. Plng. Assoc., 57(2) 165–182.
8.
Pivo, G.(1990). “The net of mixed beads—the suburbanization of employment in America.”J. Am. Plng. Assoc., 56, 457–469.
9.
Schumann, J. W., and Phraner, S. D. (1994). “Regional rail for U.S. metropolitan areas: Concepts and applications.”Transp. Res. Record 1433, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 83–88.
10.
Steen, R. C.(1986). “Nonubiquitous transportation and urban population density gradients.”J. Urban Economics, 20, 97–106.
11.
Voith, R.(1991). “The long-run elasticity of demand for commuter rail transportation.”J. Urban Economics, 30, 360–372.
12.
Voith, R. (1992). “Transportation, sorting and house values in the Philadelphia metropolitan area.”Annu. Meeting, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
13.
Voith, R.(1993). “Changing capitalization of CBD-oriented transportation systems: Evidence from Philadelphia, 1970–1988.”J. Urban Economics, 33, 361–376.
14.
Wells, S. S. (1994). “Analysis of the differential impacts of transport modes on travel behaviour in the greater Toronto area,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
15.
White, M.(1988). “Location choice and commuting behavior in cities with decentralized employment.”J. Urban Economics, 24, 129–152.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 4 • July 1996
Pages: 270 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1996
Published in print: Jul 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.