Evaluating Steady-State Assumption for Highway Queueing System
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 2
Abstract
Stochastic queueing methods are often applied to highway systems to estimate performance characteristics such as delay and queue length. Inherent in stochastic queueing methods is the assumption that the system in question operates at steady state for the duration of the analysis period. The validity of this assumption with respect to traffic-flow facilities is, at times, in question. It is therefore somewhat surprising that the vast body of literature concerned with the application of stochastic queueing methods for the assessment of highway operation includes very little discussion on the relevance of the steady-state assumption. This paper presents a simulation-based methodology for evaluating the appropriateness of the steady-state assumption. The methodology is demonstrated using a particular type of highway facility—a two-lane highway work zone. Application of the methodology suggests that the assumption of steady-state operation may not always be reasonable and, as such, illustrates the potential need to investigate the steady-state tendencies of a facility type prior to exploiting stochastic queueing techniques.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis theory & application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
2.
Bhat, U.(1970). “A controlled transportation queueing process.”Mgmt. Sci., 16(7), 446–452.
3.
California Department of Transportation. (1978). “One-way traffic control on construction projects.”Memo., May 23, 1978.
4.
Cassidy, M. J., and Han, L. D.(1993). “A proposed model for predicting motorist delays at two-lane highway work zones.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 27–42.
5.
Cassidy, M. J., Son, Y. T., and Rosowsky, D. V. (1993). “A probabilistic approach to estimating motorist delay at two-lane highway work zones.”Transp. Res.–B, 28A(5), 433–444.
6.
Hall, R. W. (1991). Queueing methods for services and manufacturing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7.
Hogg, R. V., and Tanis, E. A. (1988). Probability and statistical inference. MacMillan Publishing, New York, N.Y.
8.
Little, J. G.(1971). “Queueing of side street traffic at a priority type vehicle-actuated signal.”Transp. Res., 5(4), 295–300.
9.
Madanat, S. M., Cassidy, M. J., and Wang, M. H.(1995). “A probabilistic model of queueing delay at stop-controlled intersection approaches.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 120(1), 21–36.
10.
Morse, P. M., and Yaffe, H. J.(1971). “A queueing model for car passing.”Transp. Sci., 5(1), 48–63.
11.
Newell, G. F. (1988). “Theory of highway traffic signals.”Working Paper UCB-ITS-WP-88-10, Inst. of Transp. Studies, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
12.
Selvi, A., and Rosenshine, M.(1983). “A queueing system for airport buses.”Transp. Res.–B, 17(6), 427–434.
13.
Transportation Research Board. (1985). “Highway Capacity Manual.”Spec. Rep. 209, Washington, D.C.
14.
Weiss, G., and Maradudin, A. (1962). “Some problems in traffic delay.”Operations Res., Vol 10, 74–104.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1995
Published in print: Mar 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.