Technologies for Planning Railroad Track Maintenance and Renewal
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 5
Abstract
Rail continues to be an important transportation mode. Like other transportation infrastructure, maintenance and replacement are critical to ensure safe, efficient operation. Research and development of technologies for condition‐data collection and computer‐based decision‐support systems are not widely reported in the literature due to the nature of the industry. This paper presents an overview of technologies for railroad track‐condition assessment and decision‐support systems for track maintenance and renewal. Track inspection methods range from visual inspection to the use of sensors and sophisticated measuring systems for the identification of corrugation, measurement of track geometry, measurement of rail wear, and location of internal rail flaws. The data produced by these systems may be integrated into a track‐quality index, or a component index, and aggregated by segment. These data are then used for safety evaluations, work planning, and strategic planning of repair and replacement. Decision‐support systems attempt to move maintenance and replacement decision making from an art to a science. They are widely used by the larger railroads. A variety of systems and issues are briefly described.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alfelor, R. (1991). “Analysis of automatically collected rail surface defect data for rail maintenance management,” PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa.
2.
Ayers, M. E., Thompson, M. R., and Uzarski, D. R. (1990). “Rapid shear strength evaluation of in‐situ granular materials.” Transp. Res. Record No. 1227, TRB, Washington, D.C., 134–146.
3.
Bing, A. J. (1982). “Track geometry data for maintenance prediction.” Proc., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
4.
Coleman, D. (1988). “Procedures and criteria for the testing and evaluation of Army railroad track.” Draft Tech. Rep., U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
5.
Cooper, J. (1992). “Improving the reliability of rail‐flaw detection.” Railway Track and Struct., 88(5), 21–24.
6.
Fazio, A. E., and Corbin, J. L. (1986). “Track quality index for high speed track.” J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 112(1), 46–61.
7.
Fazio, A. E., and Prybella, R. (1989). “Development of an analytical approach to track maintenance planning.” Transp. Res. Record 744, TRB, Washington, D.C., 46–52.
8.
Gary, A. M. (1973). “Maintenance of way and the information explosion.” Progressive Railroad, (March–April), 31–36.
9.
Hamid, A., Sawyer, D., Kenworthy, M. A., and Rasmussen, K. (1980). “A prototype maintenance‐of‐way planning system; volume I.” Tech. Rep. DOT‐FR‐80‐17, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, D.C.
10.
Hargrove, M. B., and Martland, C. D. (1990). “TRACS: total right‐of‐way analysis and costing system.” Proc., COMPRAIL, Rome, Italy.
11.
Kalay, S., O'Donnell, W., and Reinschmidt, A. (1991). “The TLV as a track inspection (measuring) device.” Proc., Int. Heavy Haul Railway Conf., Int. Heavy Haul Assoc., Vancouver, Canada, 177–184.
12.
Martland, C., et al. (1990). “Rail maintenance planning using a knowledge based expert system.” Transp. Res., 24A(1), 39–52.
13.
McNeil, S., Motazed, B., Alfelor, R., Short, T., and Eshelby, J. (1991). “Automated collection and detection of rail surface detects.” Proc., Heavy Haul Workshop, Int. Heavy Haul Assoc., Vancouver, Canada.
14.
Mesnick, D. (1992). “Workshop on systems to detect defective wood crossties and methods to prolong their useful life.” Summary of 1991 Workshop, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
15.
“RAC rapidly records rail condition.” (1987). Railway Track & Struct., 83(4), 27–33.
16.
Rail defect manual. (1964). Sperry Rail Service, Danbury, Conn.
17.
“Rail profile measuring system aids in maintenance planning.” (1989). Railway Track & Struct., 85(12), 32–33.
18.
Railroad Track Standards, JM5‐628. (1992). Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
19.
Railroad trackage assessment field manual, NAVFAC MO‐103.9. (1988). Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington, D.C.
20.
Solverson, S. C., Shahin, M. Y., and Burns, D. R. (1989). “Development of a railroad maintenance management system for Army installations: initial decision report.” Tech. Rep. M‐85/04, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL), Champaign, Ill.
21.
“Track inspection, mechanized, automated, computerized.” (1971). Railway Track and Struct., 67(3), 18–21.
22.
Track safety standards. (1982). Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Safety. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
23.
Trask, E. R., and Fraticelli, C. (1991). “The track degradation model.” Proc., Int. Heavy Haul Railway Conf., Vancouver, Canada, 54–60.
24.
Uzarski, D. R., and Plotkin, D. E. (1989). Interim method of maintenance management for U.S. Army railroad track networks. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 84–94.
25.
Uzarski, D. R. (1991). “Development of a track structure condition index,” PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
26.
Uzarski, D. R. (1992a). “Development of condition indexes for low volume railroad track.” Draft Tech. Rep., U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL), Champaign, Ill.
27.
Uzarski, D. R. (1992b). “Development of condition indexes for low volume railroad track: condition inspection survey and distress manual.” Draft Tech. Rep., U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL).
28.
Weinstock, H., Lee, H. S., and Greif, R. (1987). “A proposed track performance index for control of freight car harmonic roll response.” Transp. Res. Record No. 1006, TRB, Washington, D.C., 9–16.
29.
Zarembski, A. M. (1987a). “TQI's. Part 1. statistical.” Railway Track and Struct., 83(7), 11–77.
30.
Zarembski, A. M. (1987b). “TQI's. Part 2. alternatives.” Railway Track and Struct., 83(8), 12.
31.
Zarembski, A. M. (1985). “The impact of rail surface defects.” Railway Track and Struct., 83(11), 13.
32.
Zarembski, A. M. (1988a). “Using rail information.” Railway Track and Struct., 84(1), 12.
33.
Zarembski, A. M. (1988b). “Using radar to investigate roadbed.” Railway Track and Struct., 84(12), 16–17.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 5 • September 1994
Pages: 807 - 820
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 17, 1992
Published online: Sep 1, 1994
Published in print: Sep 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.