Laboratory versus Nondestructive Testing for Pavement Design
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 2
Abstract
A detailed comparison of moduli measured in the laboratory by resilient modulus testing with moduli measured in the field by falling weight deflec‐tometer (FWD) testing is made. This comparison includes an analysis of whether good agreement between lab and field values should be expected as well as an assessment of relative quality of the results and relative testing costs. Good agreement between lab and field measured moduli should not be expected when following the usual practice of sampling and testing only the top 1 or 2 ft (0.3 or 0.6 m) of the subgrade. Agreement is not to be expected because different volumes of the material are being tested in the laboratory compared to field testing by FWD. Because different volumes of material are tested, heterogeneity in any layer contributes to different measured moduli by lab and field testing. It is also concluded that the cost of determining moduli by laboratory resilent modulus testing is typically 60–80 times greater than the cost of an equivalent field testing program with the FWD. When the added costs of traffic control during sampling and project delays are included, the cost ratio may exceed 100. Furthermore, the moduli from field FWD testing are typically of higher quality and more appropriate for mechanistic pavement design than lab‐measured moduli. This conclusion arises from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, to erase completely the effects of sample disturbance on lab‐measured moduli. In addition, when moduli are back‐calculated from FWD testing, a proper weighting factor is automatically applied to all zones contributing to deformations, it is also possible to take advantage of compensating errors in back‐calculated moduli.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ali, N. A., and Khosla, N. P. (1987). “Determination of layer moduli using a falling weight deflectometer.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1117, 1–10
2.
Baladi, G. V., Harichandran, R. S., and Lyles, R. W. (1988). “New relationships between structural properties and asphalt mix parameters.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1171, 168–177.
3.
Bonaquist, R., Anderson, D. A., and Fernando, E. (1986). “Relationship between moduli measured in the laboratory by different procedures and field deflection measurements.” Proc., Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 55, 419–452.
4.
Bush, A.J., III. (1980). “Nondestructive testing for light aircraft pavements, Phase I: Evaluation of nondestructive testing devices.” Report No. FAA‐RD‐80‐9, Federal Aviation Admin., Washington, D.C.
5.
Jung, F. W. (1988). “Direct calculation of maximum curvature and strain in asphalt concrete layers of pavements from load deflection basin measurements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1196, 125–132.
6.
Mamlouk, M. S., Houston, W. N., Houston, S. L., and Zaniewski, J. P. (1988). “Rational characterization of pavement structures using deflection analysis.” Report No. FHWA‐AZ87–254, Arizona Dept. of Transp., Phoenix, Ariz.
7.
Nazarian, S., and Stokoe, K. H., II. (1984). “Nondestructive testing of pavements using surface waves.” Transp. Res. Rec., 993, 67–79.
8.
Newcomb, D. E. (1987). “Comparison of field and laboratory estimated resilient moduli of pavement materials.” Proc., Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. 56, 91–110.
9.
“Road and paving materials; travel surface characteristics.” (1990). Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 04.03, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
10.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. (1986). 14th Ed., part 2, American Assoc. of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1992
Published in print: Mar 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.