Urban Transit Guides Application of Advanced Train Control
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 1
Abstract
North American railway authorities are concerned about the introduction of processor‐based equipment, which often does not fit existing rules, into vital or fail‐safe functions. This situation has already been faced in the railway industry abroad, where processor‐based controls are steadily being introduced, particularly for intersection interlocking and control. Urban rail's safe use of these systems offers a valuable guide to their introduction to railways. The urban transit industry has of necessity more complex train‐control systems than most railways; and in both North America and abroad the industry has introduced complex train‐control systems that frequently involve processor‐based decision making and associated vital software. Several current train‐control systems, some of which operate trains without drivers, are fully processor‐based. Most rail systems with rolling stock, train‐control, or vital subsystems using software‐based processors have implemented a safety‐assurance plan or its equivalent. These plans usually examine the entire system, including software safety assurance. The operator will normally accept documentation from a supplier's systems‐safety assurance plan. The plan will invariably audit suppliers' design and assurance processes and produce a paper trail that goes back to the initial design work.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“ comes to the railroads.” (1989). Progressive Railroading, 33(9), 43–48.
2.
“Identification of functional components for advanced train control system.” (1985). Publication 3055‐01‐TR‐3631, Arinc Research Corporation, Annapolis, Md.
3.
Lemm, U. (1988). “Computer‐assisted train control in the Cologne area of the German Federal Railways.” Railway Tech. Review, 29, 49–55.
4.
“National urban mass transportation statistics section 15 annual report.” (1987). Report UMTA‐VA‐06‐0127‐89‐1, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C.
5.
“Quality assurance for the development of software used in critical applications.” (1989). CAN/CSA‐Q396.1.1‐89. Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6.
Summary of railway accidents and incidents. (1989). Railway/Commodity Pipeline Investigations Branch, Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
7.
Turner, D. B., Burns, R. D., and Hecht, H. (1987). “Designing micro‐based systems for fail‐safe travel.” IEEE Spectrum, 23(2), 58–63.
8.
Walther, H., and Lennartz, K. (1988). “The use of solid‐state interlocking on the German Federal Railways.” Railway Tech. Review, 29, 39–47.
9.
Wolf, W. A. (1978). “Fault tree analysis.” Report, Atomic Energy of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1992
Published in print: Jan 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.