Effects of Horizontal‐Curve Transition Design on Truck Roll Stability
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 1
Abstract
The intent of this article is to provide information that will facilitate the design of roads that are safer for heavy trucks, which have a greater tendency to roll over than passenger cars. The roll performance of tractor‐semitrailer trucks on horizontal curves with three different types of transitions is investigated using computer simulation, and the results are used to develop guidelines for horizontal‐curve transition design. The roll dynamics of a truck traveling on a transition and a superelevated curve are described, and the effect of superelevation on the rollover threshold of tractor‐semitrailer trucks is also discussed. Three evaluation parameters (roll stability margin, acceleration overshoot, and critical speed) are proposed and used in evaluating different transition types. Three types of transition are investigated: one in which 2/3 of the maximum superelevation is developed before the start of the curve; one in which the superelevation is fully developed at the start of the curve; and one in which superelevation is developed in a short spiral section. A test matrix consisting of different truck speeds, different radius curves, and different transitions is used. The spiral transition is shown to be most desirable type of transition.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ajluni, K. K. (1989). “Rollover potential of vehicles on embankments, sideslopes, and other roadside features.” Public Roads, 52(4), 107–113.
2.
Alves, G. S. (1988). “Computer simulation of truck rollover performance on horizontal curves,” thesis presented to The Pennsylvania State University, at University Park, Pa., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
3.
Carsten, O. (1987). “Safety implications of truck configuration.” Transp. Res. Record, 1111, 17–26.
4.
El‐Gindy, M., and Wong, J. Y. (1987). “A comparison of various computer simulation models for predicting the directional response of articulated vehicles.” Vehicle System Dynamics, 16(5–6), 249–68.
5.
Ervin, R. D. (1983). “Influence of size and weight variables on the roll stability of heavy duty trucks.” SAE Paper No. 831163, Aug.
6.
Ervin, R. D., MacAdam, C. C., and Barnes, M. (1985). “Influence of the geometric design of highway ramps on the stability and control of heavy duty trucks.” Transp. Res. Record, 1,052, 77–89.
7.
Gillespie, T., MacAdam, C., Hu, G. T., Bernard, J., Winkler, C. (1979). “Truck and tractor trailer dynamic response simulation volume 2. Technical report.” UM‐HSRI‐79‐85‐2, Highway Safety Res. Inst., Ann Arbor, Mich.
8.
Harwood, D. W., Mason, J. M., Glanz, W. D., Kulakowski, B. T., and Fitzpatrick, K. (1989). “Development of truck characteristics for use in highway design and operation.” FHWA‐RD‐89‐227, Federal Highway Admin., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
9.
Meyer, C. F., and Gibson, D. W. (1980). Route surveying and design. 5th Ed., Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.
10.
MacAdam, C. C., Fancher, P. S., Hu, G. T., and Gillespie, T. D. (1980). “A computerized dynamics of trucks, tractor semi‐trailers, doubles, and triples combinations: User's manual—Phase 4.” UM‐HSRI‐80‐58, Highway Safety Res. Inst., Ann Arbor, Mich.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1991
Published in print: Jan 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.