Implementing Headway‐Based Reliability Control on Transit Routes
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper presents the operational issues and results of implementing real‐time headway‐based reliability control along candidate bus routes operated by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in 1987. The procedure involves holding buses at a control point on the route until a prescribed minimum headway is achieved. Headway‐based control strategies apply to high‐frequency transit routes where headways are sufficiently short that travelers arrive randomly at bus stops without consulting a schedule. It is considered appropriate for correcting service disruptions that have already occurred, or for preventing propagation and further service degradation. The goal of this effort is to improve service reliability as perceived by travelers, as well as to allow for more effective utilization of operator resources. Failure by street supervisors to consistently follow holding instructions and data collection problems involving point checkers hampered the evaluation effort. Nevertheless, it appears that certain routes may benefit from holding actions. Where these improvements are measurable, dramatic operator savings, due to reduced vehicle requirements, may be realized. This depends on the extent to which passenger load, relative to vehicle capacity, may preclude the operator from taking maximum advantage of the derived service benefits.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abkowitz, M., and Engelstein, I. (1984). “Methods for maintaining transit service regularity.” Transp. Res. Record, 961, 1–8.
2.
Abkowitz, M., Eiger, A., and Engelstein, I. (1986). “Optimal control of headway variation on transit routes.” J. of Advanced Transp., 20(1), 73–88.
3.
Abkowitz, M., et al. (1978). “Transit service reliability.” Report No. UMTA‐MA‐06‐0049‐78‐1, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C., Dec.
4.
Barnett, A. (1974). “On controlling randomness in transit operations.” Transp. Sci., 8(2), 102–116.
5.
Englisher, L. S. (1984). “Minneapolis‐St. Paul transit service reliability demonstration.” Report No. UMTA‐MA‐06‐0049‐83‐8, Urban Mass Transp. Admin., Washington, D.C., Apr.
6.
Holroyd, E. M., and Scraggs, D. A. (1966). “Waiting times for buses in central London.” Traffic Engrg. and Control, 8(3), 158–160.
7.
Kulash, D. (1971). “Routing and scheduling in public transit systems,” dissertation presented to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
8.
Loo, D. F. (1981). “Evaluation of schedule‐based holding for transit vehicles: A case study of bus route 5 in Minneapolis Minnesota.” Staff Study, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Transp. Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.
9.
Smith, S. B. (1986). “The use of routinely collected data to improve transit service reliability,” thesis presented to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
10.
Turnquist, M. A., and Blume, S. W. (1980). “Evaluating the potential effectiveness of headway control strategies for transit systems.” Transp. Res. Record, 746, 25–29.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1990
Published in print: Jan 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.