Case for Variable Design Standards for Secondary Roads
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 113, Issue 2
Abstract
Work has been done to develop a rating system for priority planning use with secondary roads. A key constituent of the rating system is the design standard. It provides the basis for several rating criteria used to evaluate a given road for inclusion in road improvement programs. Therefore, choice of relative design standards can have a significant effect on a rating. Design standards commonly used for secondary roads are similar to those adopted for primary roads with concern for traffic volume and travel speeds. However, this does not necessarily reflect the principal use of these roads as collectors and local access. Emphasis should be on accessibility, and travel speed is less important a factor. Use of lowered design speeds is proposed as one way to economize by avoiding higher costs associated with improved alignment, wider roadways, and flatter ditch slopes. Possible effects on tort liability are reviewed and sample standards are described.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Carstens, R. L. (1981). “Highway Related Tort Claims to Iowa Counties.” Transportation Research Record 833, 18–24.
2.
Eck, R. W., and Malaeb, H. H. (1983). “Reducing Tort Liability on Low‐Volume Roads Through Analysis of Case Law.” Transportation Research Record 898, 115–122.
3.
Geometric Design Guide for Local Roads and Streets. AASHO (Amer. Assoc. of State Highway Officials), Washington, D.C.
4.
Hudson, W. R., McGarragh, T. G., and Pelzer, A. (1975). “A Pavement Management Concept for Low‐Volume Roads.” Transportation Research Board Special Report 160, 230–244.
5.
Mercier, C. R. (1983). “Low‐Volume Roads: Closure and Alternative Uses.” Transportation Research Record 898, 110–115.
6.
Mercier, C. R. (1986). “Sufficiency Ratings for Secondary Roads: Model Development.” Paper delivered to 65th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
7.
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. (1985). AASHTO (Amer. Assoc. of State Highway and Transp. Officials), Washington, D.C.
8.
A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways. (1971). Amer. Assoc. of State Highway Officials. Washington, D.C.
9.
Quadrennial Needs Study, 1982–2001. (1982). Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 1982.
10.
Zegeer, C. V., and Rizenbergs, R. L. (1979). “Priority Programming for Highway Reconstruction.” Transportation Research Record 698, 15–23.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1987
Published in print: Mar 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.