Systematic Calibration of Multinomial Logit Models
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 109, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic procedure for calibrating a multinomial logit model through the use of the UTPS computer package developed by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) for the purpose of travel demand forecasting. A brief examination of the mathematical basis of the multinomial logit model is also presented. The proposed procedure incorporates the use of a number of UTPS program modules, and lends itself to the use of a data base commonly available to most regional and local planning agencies. A comprehensive case study is presented, demonstrating the applicability of the procedure in a medium‐sized urban area in southeast Michigan. The paper is written on the premise that the diagnostic tests contained in the ULOGIT module (the software developed by UMTA for calibrating logit models) constitute a necessary step towards model calibration, but are not sufficient for the identification of the overall best model. A number of other critical tests are recommended in the paper that require the use of the candidate models in actual multimodal allocation of the person trips, and the identification of the best model based upon the overall goodness of fit between the observed data and estimated data. The case study shows that the diagnostic tests contained in ULOGIT can be used to develop models with similar predictive qualities. The writers recommend the use of this procedure since it will aid the planner in identifying the model with the overall best predictive quality.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alonso, W., “The Quality of Data and The Choice and Design of Predictive Models,” Highway Research Board Special Report 97, 1968, pp. 178–192.
2.
Chatterjee, A., and Sinha, K. C., “Mode Choice for Small Urban Areas,” Transportation Engineering Journal, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. TE2, May, 1975, pp. 265–278.
3.
Cherwony, W., and Lutin, J., “Two Dimensional Logit Modal Split Model,” Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, Vol. 102, No. TE3, Aug., 1976, pp. 525–535.
4.
Domencich, T., and McFadden, D., “Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis,” North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975.
5.
Fertal, M. J., et al., “Modal‐Split—Documentation of Nine Methods for Estimating Transit Usage,” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1966.
6.
Kumar, A., “Use of Incremental Form of Logit Models in Demand Analysis,” Transportation Research Record 775, 1980, pp. 21–27.
7.
Southworth, F., “Calibration of Multinomial Logit Models of Mode & Destination Choice,” Transportation Research, Vol. 15A, Peragmon Press Ltd., 1981, pp. 315–325.
8.
McFadden, D., et al., “Diagnostic Tests for the Independence From Irrelevant Alternatives Property of the Multinomial Logit Model,” Institute of Transportation Studies, Warning Paper No. 7616, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1976.
9.
Meyburg, A. H., and Stopher, P., “Aggregate & Disaggregate Travel Demand Models,” Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, Vol. 101, No. TE2, May, 1975, pp. 237–245.
10.
Talvite, A. P., “Aggregate Travel‐Demand Analysis with Dissaggregate or Aggregate Travel Demand Models,” Proceedings, Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1973.
11.
“The Development of a Multinomial Logit Travel Demand Model for the Evaluation of Energy and Air Quality Impacts of Transportation Strategies,” Final Report for the Michigan Department of Transportation, 1981.
12.
“UTPS Reference Manual,” U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1983
Published in print: Mar 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.