TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 15, 2009

Network Calibration for Unfavorable Reference-Rover Geometry in Network-Based RTK: Ohio CORS Case Study

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 3

Abstract

In the network-based real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system approach, the rover positioning accuracy and reliability depends on the quality of the atmospheric corrections, which is largely a function of spatial and temporal variability of ionospheric and tropospheric parameters. The location of the rover receiver with respect to the reference network receivers is also a very important factor, especially for applications such as off-shore navigation, where favorable geometry cannot always be assured. The primary goal of this paper is to describe tests of the speed and reliability of the ambiguity resolution and the ultimate accuracy of kinematic positioning for two representative reference receiver geometries: (1) pentagonal reference receiver geometry, with network-rover separation up to 131km , which represents a typical reference scenario where the rover is located inside the reference network; and (2) irregular geometry, simulating a shore-bound scenario where the reference network can support only extrapolation of the atmospheric corrections to an off-shore rover (outside the reference network), with network–rover separation up to 200km . The latter scenario is of special interest here, as the objective is to investigate the maximum acceptable separation of the rover receiver from the shore-bound reference stations. The Ohio Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) network is used to simulate both scenarios, and the MPGPS software developed at The Ohio State University Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation Laboratory is used to carry out the analyses over a 24-h period of varying ionospheric activity. As a result of this study, the error budget associated with both network geometries is obtained, and the limitations of the network approach as a function of the network-rover geometry can be ascertained.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank Dr. Gerry Mader of the National Geodetic Survey for his insightful comments on the draft of this paper, and Professor Chris Rizos of the University of New South Wales, for revising the final version of this manuscript. They would also like to thank Miss. Karla Edwards, a Ph.D. student at The Ohio State University, for providing VTEC estimates. During his stay at The Ohio State University, the second writer was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Ahn, Y. W., Lachapelle, G., Skone, S., Gutman, S., and Sahm, S. (2006). “Analysis of GPS RTK performance using external NOAA tropospheric corrections integrated with a multiple reference station approach.” GPS Solutions, 10(3), 171–186.
Alber, C., Ware, R., Rocken, C., and Braun, J. (2000). “Obtaining single path phase delays from GPS double differences.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(17), 2661–2664.
Altamimi, Z., Pillard, P., and Boucher, C. (2002). “ITRF2000: A new release of the international terrestrial reference Frame for earth science applications.” J. Geophys. Res., 107(B10), 2214, ⟨http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2002/2001JB000561.shtml⟩.
Alves, P., Ahn, Y. W., and Lachapelle, G. (2003). “The effects of network geometry on network RTK using simulated GPS data.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GPS/GNSS 2003, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 1417–1427.
Dach, R., Hugentobler, U., Fridez, P., and Meindl, M. (2007). User’s manual of the Bernese GPS software version 5.0, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dai, L., Han, S., Wang, J., and Rizos, C. (2004). “Comparison of interpolation algorithms in network-based GPS techniques.” Navigation, 50(4), 277–293.
Diep Dao, T. H., Alves, P., and Lachapelle, G. (2004). “Performance evaluation of multiple reference station GPS RTK for a medium scale network.” J. Glob. Positioning Syst., 3(1–2), 173–182.
Feng, Y., and Rizos, C. (2005). “Global, regional and local GNSS approaches: Concept and performance perspectives.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GNSS 2005, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 2277–2287.
Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., et al. (2004). “An analysis of the effects of different network-based ionosphere estimation models on rover positioning accuracy.” J. GPS, 3(1–2), 115–131.
Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., et al. (2007). “On efficiency and reliability of ambiguity resolution in network-based RTK GPS.” J. Surv. Eng., 133(2), 56–65.
Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., Kashani, I., and Wielgosz, P. (2005). “On accuracy and reliability of instantaneous network RTK as a function of network geometry, station separation, and data processing strategy.” GPS Solutions, 9(3), 179–193.
Guo, J., and Langley, R. B. (2003). “A new tropospheric propagation delay mapping function for elevation angles down to 2°.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GPS/GNSS 2003, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 368–376.
The International Service of Geomagnetic Indices (ISGI). (2008). ⟨http://isgi.cetp.ipsl.fr/source/indices/Kp/kp2004.wdc⟩ (Jan. 2, 2008).
Joosten, P. (2001). “The LAMBDA method: Matlab™ implementation version 2.1.” Mathematical geodesy and positioning civil engineering and geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kashani, I., Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., and Wielgosz, P. (2005). “Towards instantaneous network-based RTK GPS over 100km distance.” Navigation, 52(4), 239–245.
Kashani, I., Wielgosz, P., and Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A. (2004). “The effect of double difference ionospheric corrections latency on instantaneous ambiguity resolution in long-range RTK.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GNSS 2004, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 2881–2890.
Koch, K. R., and Kusche, J. (2002). “Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components.” J. Geodyn., 76(5), 259–268.
Rizos, C. (2002). “Network RTK research and implementation: A geodetic perspective.” J. GPS, 1(2), 144–150.
Schaer, S. (1999). “Mapping and predicting the earth’s ionosphere using the global positioning system.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Schwarz, C. R. (2008). “Heuristic weighting and data conditioning in the National Geodetic Survey rapid static GPS (RSGPS) software.” J. Surv. Eng., 134(3), 76–82.
Schwarz, C. R., Snay, R. A., and Soler, T. (2009). “Accuracy assessment of the National Geodetic Survey's OPUS-RS utility.” GPS Solutions, 13(2), 119–132.
Teunissen, P. J. G. (1994). “A new method for fast carrier phase ambiguity estimation.” Proc., IEEE PLANS, IEEE, New York, 562–573.
Uotila, U. A. (1986). “Notes on adjustment computation. Part I.” Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio.
Verhagen, S. (2004). “Integer ambiguity validation: An open problem?” GPS Solutions, 8(1), 36–43.
Verhagen, S. (2005). “On reliability of integer ambiguity resolution.” Navigation, 52(2), 99–10.
Vollath, U., Buecherl, A., Landau, H., Pagels, C., and Wagner, B. (2000). “Multi-base RTK positioning using virtual reference stations.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GPS 2000, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 123–131.
Vollath, U., Landau, H., Chen, X., Doucet, K., and Pagels, C. (2002). “Network RTK versus single base RTK—Understanding the error characteristics.” Proc., Institute of Navigation GPS 2002, The Institute of Navigation, Manassas, Va., 2774–2781.
Wang, J., Stewart, M., and Tsakiri, M. (1998). “A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly.” J. Geodyn., 72(11), 644–653.
Wielgosz, P., Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., and Kashani, I. (2004). “Network approach to precise medium range GPS navigation.” Navigation, 51(3), 213–220.
Wielgosz, P., Kashani, I., and Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A. (2005). “Analysis of long-range network RTK during severe ionospheric storm.” J. Geodyn., 79(9), 524–531.
Zhang, K., et al. (2006). “Sparse or dense: Challenges of Australian network RTK.” IGNSS Symp., International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society, Queensland, Australia.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 135Issue 3August 2009
Pages: 90 - 100

History

Received: Mar 10, 2008
Accepted: Sep 26, 2008
Published online: Jul 15, 2009
Published in print: Aug 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska, M.ASCE [email protected]
Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210. E-mail: [email protected]
Niyazi Arslan
Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210; and, Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering Dept., Yildiz Technical Univ., Turkey.
Pawel Wielgosz
Univ. of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Chang-Ki Hong
Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share