Method for Optimizing Earthwork Considering Soil Properties in the Geometric Design of Highways
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 4
Abstract
Economic considerations are one of the most fundamental elements affecting the standards of highway projects. Therefore, cut-fill balancing and minimizing the amount of earthwork are significant factors that can decrease construction costs. In order to achieve this, the “weighted ground line method,” which describes a hypothetical ground line that guides cut-fill balancing and minimizes the total amount of earthwork, is presented. The main idea of this approach is to find a “hypothetical reference line” (instead of a ground line) that makes the earthwork optimization possible in terms of cut-fill balancing as well as earthwork minimization. Because the centerline ground elevation rarely represents the transverse changes in the ground elevations of a cross section (template), setting the grade line as close as possible to the ground line may be misleading in terms of optimizing earthwork. Another point to be considered is that all the excavated (cut) material may not be used as a fill material due to the difference between the original volume in a cut and the volume in a fill after compaction. Furthermore, all excavated material may not be suitable for fill. In this respect, to be able to accomplish the exact cut-fill balance and minimize the total amount of earthwork, these two factors must be taken into consideration. For this reason, modified cut and fill volumes should be used for calculating weighted ground elevations. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to balance the cut-fill volume and minimize the amount of earthwork while considering shrinkage and swell factors, thereby achieving much more cost-effective results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
4.
Abbey, L. (1992). Highways, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1994). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, D.C.
2.
Atkins, H.N. (1997). Highway materials, soils, and concretes, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
3.
AUSTROADS. ( 1993). “Rural road design.” Guide to the geometric design of rural roads, Sydney, Australia.
5.
Banks, J.H. (1998). Introduction to transportation engineering, WCB/McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
6.
Batson, R.G., and Proudlove, J.A. (1968). Roads, Longmans, Green, and Co., London.
7.
Bruce, A.G., and Clarkson, J. (1950). Highway design and construction, International Textbook, Scranton, Pa.
8.
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). (1995). Highway design manual, Sacramento, Calif.
9.
Chapra, S.C., and Canale, R.P. (1998). Numerical methods for engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10.
Coduto, D.P. (1999). Geotechnical engineering, principles and practices, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
11.
Easa, S. M. (1988). “Estimating pit excavation volume using nonlinear ground profile.” J. Surv. Eng., 114(2), 71–83.
12.
Easa, S. M. (1991). “Pyramid frustum formula for computing volumes at roadway transition areas.” J. Surv. Eng., 117(2), 98–101.
13.
Easa, S. M. (1998). “Smooth surface approximation for computing pit excavation volume.” J. Surv. Eng., 124(3), 125–133.
14.
Easa, S. M. (1999). “Optimum vertical curves for highway profiles.” J. Surv. Eng., 125(3), 147–157.
15.
Garber, N.J., and Hoel, L.A. (1988). Traffic and highway engineering, West Publishing, St. Paul, Minn.
16.
Gibreel, G. M., Easa, S. M., Hassan, Y., and El-Dimeery, I. A. (1999). “State of art of highway geometric design consistency.” J. Transp. Eng., 125(4), 305–313.
17.
Goktepe, A. B., and Lav, A. H. (2003). “Method for balancing cut-fill and minimizing the amount of earthwork in the geometric design of highways.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(5), 564–571.
18.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1997). “Design considerations for combined highway alignments.” J. Transp. Eng., 123(1), 60–68.
19.
Krammes, R.A., and Granham, M.A. (1995). “Worldwide review of alignment design policies.” Proc., 1st Int. Symposium on Highway Geometric Design Practices, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
20.
Mannering, F.L., and Kilareski, W.P. (1990). Principles of highway engineering and traffic analysis, Wiley, New York.
21.
Mathews, J.F. (1992). Numerical methods for mathematics, science, and engineers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
22.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (1986). “Design manual for foundations and earth structures.” NAVFAC DM 7.02, Washington, D.C.
23.
NETCAD-NETPRO v2.95 software manual. (1999). Ak Engineering, Ankara, Turkey.
24.
Oglesby, C.H., and Hicks, R.G. (1982). Highway engineering, Wiley, Toronto.
25.
Papacostas, C.S., and Prevedouros, P.D. (1993). Transportation engineering and planning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
26.
Rodriguez, A.R., Castillo, H., and Sowers, G.F. (1988). Soil mechanics in highway engineering, Trans Tech, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany.
27.
Schoon, J.G. (1993). Geometric design projects for highways: An introduction, ASCE, New York.
28.
Sthapit, N., and Mori, H. (1994). “Model to estimate highway earthwork cost in Nepal.” J. Transp. Eng., 120(3), 498–504.
29.
Taiganidis, I., and Kanellaidis, G. (1999). “Approximate perspective design of roads.” J. Transp. Eng., 125(4), 314–323.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.