Effect of Orbital a Priori Information on Baseline Determinations
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 1
Abstract
There is continuously increasing demand for very accurate baselines, especially over long distances. Such accurate baselines are required for geodynamic studies, orbit generation, and for very precise geodetic applications. Therefore, in order to achieve baseline accuracies around by using GPS techniques, realistic a priori stochastic information for parameters must be considered in the future. Several data sets of simulated GPS measurements for a ground network are created and adjusted while taking into consideration both errorless as well as erroneous orbital information. The adjustment results clearly indicate the influence of erroneous orbital information on the baselines. It is also observed that by incorporating the orbital uncertainty information in the adjustment, the baseline results are significantly improved. The consideration of a priori information of additional parameters such as ground coordinates, etc., further upgraded the results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beck, N., et al. (1986). “Guide to GPS positioning.” Canadian GPS Associates, Box 3184, Postal Station B, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3A 5G9.
2.
Beutler, G., et al. (1985). “Evaluation of the 1984 Alaska GPS campaign with Bernese second generation software.” EOS Trans., AGU, 66, 858.
3.
Bock, Y., et al. (1985). “Establishment of three‐dimensional geodetic control by interferometry with the global positioning system.” JGR, 90(B9), 7689–7703.
4.
Bock, Y., et al. (1986). “A demonstration of 1–2 parts in 10 million accuracy using GPS.” Bulletin Geodesique, 60, 241–254.
5.
Brunner, F. K., Frei, E., and Chamberlain, S. M. (1987). “Test measurements using the WM101.” Wild Herebrugg Ltd., Switzerland.
6.
Eren, K. (1986). “GPS network adjustment using triple difference observations and a priori information.” Manuscripta Geodaetica, 11, 289–292.
7.
Eren, K. (1987). “Geodetic network adjustment using GPS triple difference observations and a priori stochastic information.” Tech. Rep. 1, Inst. of Geodesy, Univ. of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, W. Germany.
8.
Goad, C. C., and Remondi, B. W. (1984). “Initial relative positioning results using the global positioning system.” Bull. Geod., 58, 193–210.
9.
Kleusberg, A., and Wanninger, L. (1987). “Analysis of the Juan de Fuca GPS survey 1986.” Tech. Rep., 127, Univ. of New Brunswick, Frederickton, Canada.
10.
Remondi, W. B. (1984). “Using the global positioning system (GPS) phase observable for relative geodesy: Modeling, processing, and results.” Thesis presented to the University of Texas, at Austin, Texas, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
11.
Schaffrin, B. (1985). “Das geotaetische datum mit stochastischer vorinformation.” Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission, Riehe C, Heft 313, Muenchen, West Germany (in German).
12.
Stein, W. L. (1986). “NAVSTAR global positioning system 1986 status and plans.” Proc., Fourth Int. Geodetic Symp. on Satellite Positioning, Austin, Texas, Apr.–May 1, 37–50.
13.
Vanicek, P., et al. (1985). “DIPOP: Differantial positioning program package for the global positioning system.” Report, 85–005, Dept. of Surveying Engrg., Univ. of New Brunswick, Frederickton, Canada.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1989
Published in print: Feb 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.