Experimental Investigation of Inelastic Cyclic Buckling and Fracture of Steel Braces
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 1
Abstract
Results from 18 large-scale tests of steel bracing members are presented to examine their inelastic buckling and fracture behavior as related to the seismic design of concentrically braced frames. The brace specimens include square hollow structural shapes (HSS), pipe, and wide-flange sections. The effect of various parameters, including width–thickness and slenderness ratios, cross-section shape, loading history, loading rate, and grout fill on the performance of these braces is investigated. Among these parameters, loading history, width–thickness ratio and slenderness ratio are shown to have the largest influence on brace ductility. The test data suggest that for some HSS and pipe specimens, current seismic design provision limits on maximum width–thickness ratios may not provide sufficient ductility for seismic design. Effects of loading rate are found to be insignificant, and the grout fill is shown to provide a modest improvement in cyclic ductility. Measurements of brace stiffness, tensile strength and compressive strength compare well with design formulas. Future analytical studies to simulate brace buckling and fracture are outlined as a way to generalize the findings of the physical tests.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant NSFCMS 0421492), the George E. Brown Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES), and the Structural Steel Educational Council (SSEC). The advice and guidance of Helmut Krawinkler (Stanford University), Charles Roeder (University of Washington), Walterio López, and Mark Saunders (Rutherford and Chekene) is greatly appreciated. In addition, the knowledgeable support of the UC Berkeley NEES lab personnel including Shakhzod Takhirov, Donald Patterson, Donald Clyde, David MacLam, and Jose Robles was extremely important in the experimental aspect of this study. The writers also acknowledge support from the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center at Stanford University and the University of California, Davis.
References
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005a). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005b). Steel construction manual, 13th Ed., Chicago.
Anderson, T. L. (1995). Fracture mechanics, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Astaneh-Asl, A. (1998). “Seismic behavior and design of gusset plates.” SteelTIPS, technical information and product service, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, Calif.
Barsom, J. M., and Rolfe, S. T. (1987). Fracture and fatigue control in structures—Applications of fracture mechanics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Fell, B. V. (2008). “Large-scale testing and simulation of earthquake-induced ultra low cycle fatigue in bracing members subjected to cyclic inelastic buckling.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Fell, B. V., Kanvinde, A. M., Deierlein, G. G., Myers, A. M., and Fu, X. (2006). “Buckling and fracture of concentric braces under inelastic cyclic loading.” SteelTIPS, technical information and product service, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, Calif.
Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (1999). “Prediction of seismic demands for SMRFs with ductile connections and elements.” SAC Background Document, Rep. No. SAC/BD-99/06, SAC Steel Project, Sacramento, Calif.
Han, S.-W., Kim, W. T., and Foutch, D. A. (2007). “Seismic behavior of HSS bracing members according to width-thickness ratio under symmetric cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(2), 264–273.
Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc. (HKS). (1998). ABAQUS user’s manual, version 5.8, Providence, R.I.
Izvernari, C., Lacerte, M., and Tremblay, R. (2007). “Seismic performance of multi-storey concentrically braced steel frames designed according to the 2005 Canadian Seismic Provisions.” Proc., 9th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Canadian Association of Earthquake Engineering, Ottawa.
Jain, A. K., Goel, S. C., and Hanson, R. D. (1978). “Inelastic response of restrained steel tubes.” J. Struct. Div., 104(6), 897–910.
Kanvinde, A., and Deierlein, G. G. (2004). “Micromechanical simulation of earthquake induced fractures in steel structures.” Blume Center TR145, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Kanvinde, A. M., and Deierlein, G. G. (2007). “A cyclic void growth model to assess ductile fracture in structural steels due to ultra low cycle fatigue.” J. Eng. Mech., 133(6), 701–712.
Koteski, N., Packer, J. A., and Puthli, R. S. (2005). “Notch toughness of internationally produced hollow structural sections.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(2), 279–286.
Lee, K., and Bruneau, M. (2005). “Energy dissipation of compression members in concentrically braced frames: Review of experimental data.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(4), 552–559.
Lemaitré, J., and Chaboche, J.-L. (1990). Mechanics of solid materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Liu, Z., and Goel, S. C. (1988). “Cyclic load behavior of cement-filled tubular braces.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(7), 1488–1506.
McCormick, J., DesRoches, R., Fugazza, D., and Auricchio, F. (2007). “Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(6), 862–870.
Popov, E. P., and Black, R. G. (1981). “Steel struts under severe cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Div., 107(9), 1857–1881.
Sabelli, R. (2000). Research on improving the design and analysis of earthquake resistant steel braced frames, FEMA/EERI, Washington, D.C.
SAC. (2000). “Loading histories for seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies.” SAC/BD-00/10, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif.
Schafer, B. W., and Pekoz, T. (1998). “Computational modeling of cold formed steel: Characterizing geometric imperfections and residual strains.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 47(3), 193–210.
Shaback, B., and Brown, T. (2003). “Behavior of square hollow structural steel braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 30(4), 745–753.
Tang, X., and Goel, S. C. (1989). “Brace fractures and analysis of phase I structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 115(8), 1960–1976.
Tremblay, R. (2000). “Influence of brace slenderness on the seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames.” Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas: Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. STESSA, F. M. Mazzolani and R. Tremblay, eds., Balkema, Montreal, 527–534.
Tremblay, R. (2002). “Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(5), 665–701.
Uriz, P. (2005). “Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Uriz, P., and Mahin, S. A. (2004). “Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Pergamon, Oxford, England.
Whitmore, R. E. (1950). “Experimental investigation of stresses in gusset plates.” Masters’ thesis, University of Tennessee Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin No. 16, Knoxville, Tenn.
Yang, F., and Mahin, S. (2005). “Limiting net section fracture in slotted tube braces.” SteelTIPS, technical information and product service, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 9, 2007
Accepted: Jul 9, 2008
Published online: Jan 1, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2009
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: James S. Davidson
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.