TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2008

Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of Steel–Concrete Composite Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 6

Abstract

Frame finite-element models permit obtaining, at moderate computational cost, significant information on the dynamic response behavior of steel–concrete composite (SCC) frame structures. As an extension of conventional monolithic beam models, composite beams with deformable shear connection were specifically introduced and adopted for the analysis of SCC beams, in which the flexible shear connection allows development of partial composite action influencing structural deformation and distribution of stresses. The use of beams with deformable shear connection in the analysis of frame structures raises very specific modeling issues, such as the characterization of the cyclic behavior of the deformable shear connection and the assembly of composite beam elements with conventional beam–column elements. In addition, the effects on the dynamic response of SCC frame structures of various factors, such as the shear connection boundary conditions and the mass distribution between the two components of the composite beam, are still not clear and deserve more investigation. The object of this paper is to provide deeper insight into the natural vibration properties and nonlinear seismic response behavior of SCC frame structures and how they are influenced by various modeling assumptions. For this purpose, a materially nonlinear-only finite-element formulation is used for static and dynamic response analyses of steel–concrete frame structures using composite beam elements with deformable shear connection. Realistic uniaxial cyclic constitutive laws are adopted for the steel and concrete materials of the beams and columns and for the shear connection. The resulting finite-element model for a benchmark problem is validated using experimental test results from the literature for quasi-static cyclic tests. The paper then focuses on the numerical simulation, based on various modeling assumptions, of the eigenproperties and seismic response of a realistic two-dimensional five-story two-bay moment resisting frame made of steel columns and SCC beams and designed according to the Eurocode. It is found that the inclusion of the deformability of the shear connection in the finite-element model has a significant effect on the global dynamic response of SCC frame structures. In modeling this type of structures by using frame elements with deformable shear connection, a proper representation of the shear connection boundary conditions for all composite beams is crucial for accurate response simulation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Partial supports of this research by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSFCMS-0010112, the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center through the Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award No. NSFEEC-9701568, and the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) under Grant No. MSS040022N involving utilization of the IBM P690 computers are gratefully acknowledged. The writers would like to thank Professor Enrico Spacone at the University of Chieti-Pescara in Italy for his support during this study. The third writer would also like to acknowledge partial support of this research by a Senior Fulbright Research Scholarship at the University of Chieti-Pescara.

References

Ayoub, A., and Filippou, F. C. (2000). “Mixed formulation of nonlinear steel-concrete composite beam element.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(3), 371–381.
Balan, T. A., Filippou, F. C., and Popov, E. P. (1997). “Constitutive model for 3D cyclic analysis of concrete structures.” J. Eng. Mech., 123(2), 143–153.
Balan, T. A., Spacone, E., and Kwon, M. (2001). “A 3D hypoplastic model for cyclic analysis of concrete structures.” Eng. Struct., 23(4), 333–342.
Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). “Finite-element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models.” Int. J. Reliability and Safety, 1(1–2), 3–39.
Barbato, M., Zona, A., and Conte, J. P. (2007). “Finite-element response sensitivity analysis using three-field mixed formulation: General theory and application to frame structures.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 69(1) 114–161.
Bursi, O. S., and Gramola, G. (1999). “Behaviour of headed stud shear connectors under low-cycle high amplitude displacements.” Mater. Struct., 32(4), 290–297.
Bursi, O. S., and Gramola, G. (2000). “Behaviour of composite substructures with full and partial shear connection under quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic displacements.” Mater. Struct., 33(3), 154–163.
Bursi, O. S., Sun, F. F., and Postal, S. (2005). “Nonlinear analysis of steel-concrete composite frames with full and partial shear connection subjected to seismic loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(1), 67–92.
Cas, B., Bratina, S., Saje, M., and Planinc, I. (2004). “Nonlinear analysis of composite steel-concrete beams with incomplete interaction.” Steel Compos. Struct., 4(6), 489–507.
Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Comité Européen de Normalization (CEN). (2004a). “Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1.1: General—General rules and rules for buildings.” EN 1994-1-1, Brussels.
Comité Européen de Normalization (CEN). (2004b). “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.” EN 1998-1-1, Brussels.
Dall’Asta, A., Dezi, L., Giacchetti, R., Leoni, G., and Ragni, L. (2005). “Dynamic response of composite frames with rubber-based dissipating devices: Experimental tests.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Advances in Steel Structures, Z. Y. Shen, G. Q. Li, and S. L. Chan, eds., Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 741–746.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2002). “Nonlinear analysis of composite beams by a displacement approach.” Comput. Struct., 80(27–30), 2217–2228.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004a). “Three-field mixed formulation for the nonlinear analysis of composite beams with deformable shear connection.” Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 40(4), 425–448.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004b). “Slip locking in finite elements for composite beams with deformable shear connection.” Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 40(13–14), 1907–1930.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004c). “Comparison and validation of displacement and mixed elements for the nonlinear analysis of continuous composite beams.” Comput. Struct., 82(23–26) 2117–2130.
Daniels, B. J., and Crisinel, M. (1993). “Composite slab behaviour and strength analysis. Part I: Calculation procedure.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(1), 16–35.
Dissanayake, U. I., Burgess, I. W., and Davison, J. B. (2000). “Modelling of plane composite frames in unpropped construction.” Eng. Struct., 22(4), 287–303.
Filippou, F. C., and Constantinides, M. (2004). “FEDEASLab getting started guide and simulation examples.” Technical Rep. No. NEESgrid-2004-22, ⟨www.ce.berkeley.edu/~filippou/FEDEASLab/NEES-grid-TR22.pdf⟩ (Jan. 2007).
Filippou, F. C., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1983). “Effects on bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints.” Rep. No. EERC 83-19, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Johnson, R. P., and Molenstra, N. (1991). “Partial shear connection in composite beams for buildings.” Proc. Inst. of Civ. Eng. (UK), 91(2), 679–704.
Kim, K. D., and Engelhardt, M. D. (2005). “Composite beam element for nonlinear seismic analysis of steel frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(5), 715–724.
Liew, J. Y. R., Chen, H., and Shanmugam, N. E. (2001). “Inelastic analysis of steel frames with composite beams.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(2), 194–202.
MathWorks Inc. (1997). Matlab—High performance numeric computation and visualization software, user’s guide, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Mass.
Menegotto, M., and Pinto, P. E. (1973). “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and nonelastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” Proc., IABSE Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 112–123.
Newmark, N. M., Siess, C. P., and Viest, I. M. (1951). “Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction.” Proc. Soc. Exp. Stress Anal., 9(1), 75–92.
Oehlers, D. J., and Bradford, M. A. (2000). Elementary behaviour of composite steel and concrete structural members, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Ollgaard, J. G., Slutter, R. G., and Fisher, J. W. (1971). “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete.” Eng. J., 2, 55–64.
Salari, M. R., and Spacone, E. (2001). “Analysis of steel-concrete composite frames with bond-slip.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(11), 1243–1250.
Spacone, E., and El-Tawil, S. (2004). “Nonlinear analysis of steel-concrete composite structures: State of the art.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(2), 159–168.
Viest, I. M., Colaco, J. P., Furlong, R. W., Griffs, L. G., Leon, R. T., and Wyllie, L. A. (1997). Composite construction design for buildings, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2005). “Finite-element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection.” J. Eng. Mech., 131(11), 1126–1139.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2007). “Nonlinear seismic response analysis of steel-concrete composite frames.” Rep. No. SSRP-07/11, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 134Issue 6June 2008
Pages: 986 - 997

History

Received: Jan 29, 2007
Accepted: Oct 8, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Note. Associate Editor: Enrico Spacone

Authors

Affiliations

Alessandro Zona
Assistant Professor, Dept. PROCAM, Univ. of Camerino, Viale della Rimembranza, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Michele Barbato
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ. at Baton Rouge, 3531 Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Nicholson Extension, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Joel P. Conte, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman D., La Jolla, CA 92093-0085 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share