Improved Understanding of Bimodal Coupled Bridge Flutter Based on Closed-Form Solutions
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 1
Abstract
Analysis of an aeroelastic bridge system consisting of the fundamental vertical and torsional modes of vibration offers an expeditious assessment of bridge flutter performance. It also produces valuable insight into the multimode coupled bridge response to strong winds. This paper presents closed-form formulations for estimating the modal frequencies, damping ratios, and coupled motions of the bimodal coupled aeroelastic bridge system at varying wind velocities. The derivation of these formulations is based on the assumption of low-level damping of the aeroelastic bridge system. This assumption has also been adopted in current modeling of self-excited forces and the analysis of coupled flutter through complex eigenvalue analysis. This framework leads to a formula for determining the critical flutter velocity of bridges with generic bluff deck sections, which not only provides an analytical basis for Selberg’s empirical formula, but also serves as its extension to generic bridges. This formula gives a single parameter or index as a function of flutter derivatives to describe the flutter efficiency of a given bridge section, which facilitates comparison of aerodynamic characteristics of different bridge deck sections. The accuracy of the proposed framework is illustrated through long span bridge examples with a variety of structural and aerodynamic characteristics. Based on the proposed framework, the significance of structural and aerodynamic characteristics on the development of coupled motion and the evolution of modal damping is discussed, which helps to better understand how and where bridges may be tailored for better flutter performance. It is pointed out that coupled bridge flutter is initiated from the modal branch that has a higher modal frequency and is characterized by coupled motion in which torsional motion lags vertical motion. The generation of coupled flutter instability is driven by the negative damping effect caused by the coupled self-excited forces.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The support of the new faculty start-up funds provided by the Texas Tech University is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Bleich, F. (1948). “Dynamic instability of truss-stiffened suspension bridges under wind action.” Proc., ASCE, 74(8), 1269–1314.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2002). “Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech., 128(11), 1193–1205.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2003a). “New frontiers in aerodynamic tailoring of long span bridges: An advanced analysis framework.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91(12–15), 1511–1528.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2003b). “Efficacy of tuned mass dampers for bridge flutter control.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(10), 1291–1300.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2006). “Revisiting multimode coupled bridge flutter: Some new insights.” J. Eng. Mech., 132(10), 1115–1123.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000a). “Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(1), 17–26.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000b). “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(1), 7–16.
Davenport, A. G., and King, J. P. C. (1984). “Dynamic wind forces on long span bridges.” Proc., 12th IABSE Congress, Vancouver, Canada, 705–712.
Diana, G., Cheli, F., Zasso, A., and Bocciolone, M. (1999). “Suspension bridge response to turbulent wind: Comparison of new numerical simulation method results with full-scale data.” Wind engineering into the 21 century, A. Larsen, G. L. Larose, and F. M. Livesey, eds, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 871–878.
Jakobsen, J. B. (1995). “Fluctuating wind load and response of a line-like engineering structure with emphasis on motion-induced wind forces.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Structural Engineering, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Univ. of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Jones, N. P., Scanlan, R. H., Jain, A., and Katsuchi, H. (1998). “Advances (and challenges) in the prediction of long-span bridge response to wind.” Bridge aerodynamics A. Larsen and S. Esdahl, eds, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 59–85.
Matsumoto, M. (1999). “Recent study on blurt body aerodynamics and its mechanism.” Wind engineering into the 21 century, A. Larsen, G. L. Larose, and F. M. Livesey, eds, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 67–78.
Matsumoto, M., Nihara, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Shirato, H., and Hamasaki, H. (1995). “Flutter mechanism and its stabilization of bluff bodies.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering, New Delhi, India, 827–838.
Miyata, T., Tada, K., Sato, H., Katsuchi, H., and Hikami, Y. (1994). “New findings of coupled flutter in full model wind tunnel tests on the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge.” Proc., Symp. on Cable-Stayed and Suspension Bridges, October 12–15, Deauville, France, 163–170.
Nakamura, Y. (1978). “An analysis of binary flutter of bridge deck.” J. Sound Vib., 57(4), 471–482.
Sabzevari, A., and Scanlan, R. H. (1968). “Aerodynamic instability of suspension bridges.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 94(2), 487–517.
Sarkar, P. P., Jones, N. P., and Scanlan, R. H. (1994). “Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 120(8), 1718–1742.
Scanlan, R. H. (1978). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. 1: Flutter theory.” J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 187–199.
Scanlan, R. H. (1993). “Problematics in formulation of wind–force models for bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech., 119(7), 1353–1375.
Scanlan, R. H., and Tomko, J. J. (1971). “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 97(6), 1717–1737.
Selberg, A. (1961). “Oscillation and aerodynamic stability of suspension bridge.” Acta Polytech. Scand., Civil Eng. and Construction Series, 13, 1–69.
Ukeguchi, N., Sakata, H., and Nishitani, H. (1966). “An investigation of aeroelastic instability of suspension bridges.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Suspension Bridges, Paper No. 11, Lisbon, 273–28.
Walshe, D. E., and Wyatt, T. A. (1992). “Bridge aerodynamics 50 years after Tacoma Narrows. Part II: A new discipline world-wide.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 40, 327–336.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 1 • January 2007
Pages: 22 - 31
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 29, 2005
Accepted: May 10, 2006
Published online: Jan 1, 2007
Published in print: Jan 2007
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Kurtis R. Gurley
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.