Simplified Method for Failure Analysis of Concrete Beams Prestressed with External Tendons
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 1
Abstract
The flexural strength of externally prestressed beams depends on the tendon stress at failure. If the tendon is free to slip at the deviators its stress will depend on the global deformation of the whole structure. Thus the tendon stress at failure, and consequently, the flexural strength cannot be evaluated by a local analysis of the critical sections, but a nonlinear analysis of the whole beam-tendon structural system is required. In the past, simplified formulas were proposed to calculate the tendon stress increment at failure avoiding the need for a nonlinear analysis of the entire structure. Some of these formulas have been adopted as code recommendations. Some approaches however do not seem to be consistent with the actual behavior of externally prestressed beams and in some cases excessively high increments of stress are recommended. On the other hand, other approaches appear to be too conservative. In this work a new simplified and rational method of analysis based on shape functions approximating deformations is proposed to study the tendon stress increment and consequently the flexural strength of externally prestressed concrete beams. The proposed simplified method reduces the analysis of externally prestressed structures from a global structure problem to an easier section problem.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (1994). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (1998). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification, Washington, D.C.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-02, Committee 318, Detroit.
Aparicio, A. C., and Ramos, G. (1996). “Flexural strength of externally prestressed concrete bridges.” ACI Struct. J., 93(5), 512–523.
Aparicio, A. C., Ramos, G., and Casas, J. R. (2002). “Testing of externally prestressed concrete beams.” Eng. Struct., 24(1), 73–84.
Comité Euro-International du Béton–Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte (CEB-FIP). (1988). “Model Code 1990.” CEB Bulletin d’Information, No. 190, Paris.
Comité Européen de Normalization (CEN). (2000). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 2: Concrete bridges.” ENV 1992-2, Brussels.
Comité Européen de Normalization (CEN). (2004). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1.1: General—General rules and rules for buildings.” EN 1992-1-1, Brussels.
Comité Européen de Normalization (CEN). (1995). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1.5: General—Structures with unbonded and external prestressing tendons.” ENV 1992-1-5, Brussels.
Conti, E., Tardy, R., and Virlogeux, M. (1993). “Friction losses in some externally prestressed bridges in France.” Proc., of the Workshop on Behaviour of External Prestressing in Structures, E. Conti, and R. Tardy, eds., Saint-Rémy-lès-Chevreuse, France.
Dall’Asta, A., and Dezi, L. (1998). “Nonlinear behavior of externally prestressed composite beams: Analytical model.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(5), 588–597.
Dall’Asta, A., Dezi, L., Leoni, G., and Zona, A. (2002). “Behaviour of concrete beams prestressed by unbonded tendons.” Proc., IABSE Symp., Melbourne, Australia, IABSE, Rep. No. 86, abstract 416–417 (CD-ROM).
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2002). “Non-linear analysis of composite beams by a displacement approach.” Comput. Struct., 80(27–30), 2217–2228.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2005). “A finite element model for externally prestressed composite beams with deformable connection.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(5), 706–714.
Fédération Internationale du Béton (FIB). (1998). “Ductility of reinforced concrete structures.” CEB Bulletin d’Information, No. 242, Paris, 112–113.
Harajli, M. H., Mabsout, M. E., and Al-Hajj, J. A. (2002). “Response of externally post-tensioned continuous members.” ACI Struct. J., 99(5), 671–680.
Lee, L. H., Moon, J. H., and Lim, J. H. (1999). “Proposed methodology for computing of unbonded tendon stress at flexural failure.” ACI Struct. J., 96(6), 1040–1048.
MacGregor, R. J. G., Kreger, M. E., and Breen, J. E. (1989). “Strength and ductility of a three-span externally post-tensioned segmental box-girder bridges.” Research Rep. No. 365-3F, Center for Transportation Research, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Moon, J. H., and Burns, N. H. (1997). “Flexural behavior of members with unbonded tendons. II: Applications.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(8), 1095–1101.
Naaman, A. E., and Alkhairi, M. (1991a). “Stress at ultimate in unbonded post-tensioning tendons: Part 1—Evaluation of the state of the art.” ACI Struct. J., 88(5), 641–651.
Naaman, A. E., and Alkhairi, M. (1991b). “Stress at ultimate in unbonded post-tensioning tendons: Part 2—Proposed methodology.” ACI Struct. J., 88(6), 683–692.
Naaman, A. E., Burns, N., French, C., Gamble, W. L., and Mattock, A. H. (2002). “Stresses in unbonded prestressing tendons at ultimate: Recommendation.” ACI Struct. J., 99(4), 518–529.
Ng, C. K. (2003). “Tendon stress and flexural strength of externally prestressed beams.” ACI Struct. J., 100(5), 644–653.
Roberts-Wollmann, C. L., Kreger, M. E., Rogowsky, D. M., and Breen, J. E. (2005). “Stresses in external tendons at ultimate.” ACI Struct. J., 102(2), 206–213.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 22, 2005
Accepted: May 15, 2006
Published online: Jan 1, 2007
Published in print: Jan 2007
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Yahya C. Kurama
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.