Analysis of Long Span Bridge Response to Winds: Building Nexus between Flutter and Buffeting
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 12
Abstract
In current bridge aeroelastic analysis frameworks, predictions of flutter instability and buffeting response to wind fluctuations are treated as two separate procedures. The flutter instability is analyzed through the solution of a complex eigenvalue problem, offering information on how the self-excited forces influence bridge dynamics, especially the modal damping, and eventually drive the bridge to develop unstable flutter motion. On the other hand, the buffeting response is quantified through spectral analysis that involves the evaluation of a complex frequency response matrix/transfer matrix at discrete frequencies, offering prediction of the statistics of bridge response. The modal properties at varying wind velocities predicted through flutter analysis have not yet been explicitly employed in predicting and interpreting buffeting response. Furthermore, current buffeting analysis frameworks often regard the complex aerodynamic admittance functions as real-valued, neglecting the phase differences of buffeting force components with respect to wind fluctuations. In this paper, a unified analysis framework of integrating both flutter and buffeting analysis is presented. The buffeting response is explicitly expressed in terms of the bridge modal properties that are influenced by the self-excited forces and predicted through the flutter analysis. Closed-form formulations are provided for quantifying the variance/covariance of buffeting response. This framework not only is computationally more effective, but also sheds more physical insight into bridge aeroelastic response by explicitly linking the effects of self-excited and buffeting forces on bridge response. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed framework are illustrated through a long span suspension bridge example. The multimode coupled bridge aeroelastic response is discussed with an emphasis placed on the significance of complex aerodynamic admittance functions on buffeting response.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The support of the new faculty startup funds provided by the Texas Tech University is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Chen, S. R., Cai, C. S., Chang, C. C., and Gu, M. (2004). “Modal coupling assessment and approximated prediction of coupled multimode wind vibration of long-span bridges.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92, 393–412.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2002a). “Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech., 128(11), 1193–1205.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2002b). “Advanced analysis of coupled buffeting response of bridges: A complex modal decomposition approach.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 17(2), 201–213.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2003a). “Aeroelastic analysis of bridges: Turbulence effects and aerodynamic nonlinearity.” J. Eng. Mech., 129(8), 885–895.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2003b). “Curve veering of eigenvalue loci of bridges with aeroelastic effects.” J. Eng. Mech., 129(2), 146–159.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2004). “Efficacy of the implied approximation in the identification of flutter derivatives.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(12), 2070–2074.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2005). “Coupled dynamic analysis and equivalent static wind loads on buildings with three-dimensional modes.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(7), 1071–1082.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000a). “Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(1), 17–26.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000b). “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(1), 7–16.
Davenport, A. G. (1962). “Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds.” ASCE J. Struct. Div., 88(3), 233–268.
Davenport, A. G. (1999). “The missing links.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering: Wind Engineering into the 21st Century, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3–13.
Der Kiureghian, A. (1980). “Structural response to stationary excitation.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 106(6), 1195–1213.
Diana, G., Bruni, S., Cigada, A., and Zappa, E. (2002). “Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90, 2057–2072.
Diana, G., Cheli, F., Zasso, A., and Bocciolone, M. (1999). “Suspension bridge response to turbulent wind: Comparison of new numerical simulation method results with full scale data.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering: Wind Engineering into the 21st Century, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 871–878.
Ge, Y. J., and Tanaka, H. (2000). “Aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(12), 1404–1412.
Irwin, P. A. (1998). “The role of wind tunnel modeling in the prediction of wind effects on bridges.” Bridge aerodynamics, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 99–117.
Jones, N. P., Scanlan, R. H., Jain, A., and Katsuchi, H. (1998). “Advances (and challenges) in the prediction of long-span bridge response to wind.” Bridge aerodynamics, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 59–85.
Scanlan, R. H. (1978a). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. I: Flutter theory.” J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 187–199.
Scanlan, R. H. (1978b). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. II: Buffeting theory.” J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 201–211.
Scanlan, R. H. (1993). “Problematics in formulation of wind-force models for bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech., 119(7), 1353–1375.
Soong, T. T., and Grigoriu, M. (1993). Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Xu, Y. L., Sun, D. K., Ko, J. M., and Lin, J. H. (2000). “Fully coupled buffeting analysis of Tsing Ma suspension bridge.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 85(1), 97–117.
Yamada, H., Miyata, T., Minh, N. N., and Katsuchi, H. (1999). “Complex flutter-mode analysis for coupled gust response of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge model.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering: Wind Engineering into the 21st Century, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1081–1088.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132 • Issue 12 • December 2006
Pages: 2006 - 2017
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 9, 2005
Accepted: Apr 19, 2006
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Sashi K. Kunnath
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.