TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2006

Alternative Formulations for Structural Optimization: An Evaluation Using Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 12

Abstract

Two alternative formulations based on the concept of simultaneous analysis and design are presented and evaluated for optimal design of framed structures. Different behavior variables, such as nodal displacements and member forces, are also treated as optimization variables in addition to the actual design variables for the problem. With these formulations, the equilibrium equations become equality constraints in the optimization process. The objective and all constraints become explicit functions of the optimization variables. Therefore, their derivatives can be obtained quite easily compared to those for the conventional approach where special design sensitivity analysis procedures must be used to calculate derivatives. It is also easier to use existing analysis software for optimization with the alternative formulations because the sensitivity equations are not formed or solved. A sequential quadratic programming method that exploits sparsity of problem functions is used to solve sample problems and evaluate the formulations. Implementation of the alternative formulations with an existing analysis program is explained. Advantages and disadvantages of the formulations are discussed. It is concluded that the alternative formulations work quite well for optimization of framed structures and have potential for further development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support for this research, provided partly by The University of Iowa under Carver Research Initiation Grant and partly by the Virtual Soldier Research program, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

AISC. (2001). Manual of steel construction-load and resistance factor design, 3rd Ed., Chicago.
Arora, J. S. (1995). “Structural design sensitivity analysis: Continuum and discrete approaches.” Advances in structural optimization, J. Herskovits, ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 47–70.
Arora, J. S. (2000). “Methods for discrete variable structural optimization.” Recent advances in optimal structural design, S. Burns, ed., Structural Engineering Institute, ASCE, Reston, Va., 1–40.
Arora, J. S. (2004). Introduction to optimum design, 2nd Ed., Elsevier, Boston.
Arora, J. S., and Wang, Q. (2005). “Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 30(4), 251–272.
Burns, S. (2002). Recent advances in optimal structural design, Structural Engineering Institute, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Chan, C.-M., Grierson, D. E., and Sherbourne, A. N. (1995). “Automatic optimal design of tall steel building frameworks.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(5), 838–847.
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Saunders, M. A. (2002). “SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization.” SIAM J. Optim., 12(4), 979–1006.
Khan, M. R. (1984). “Optimality criterion techniques applied to frames having general cross-sectional relationships.” AIAA J., 22(5), 669–676.
Khan, M. R., Willmert, K. D., and Thronton, W. A. (1978). “A new optimality criterion method for large-scale structures.” Proc., AIAA/ASME 19th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Bethesda, Md., 47–50.
Kirsch, U., and Rozvany, G. I. N. (1994). “Alternative formulations of structural optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 7(1–2), 32–41.
Missoum, S., Gürdal, Z., and Watson, L. T. (2002). “A displacement based optimization method for geometrically nonlinear frame structures.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 24(3), 195–204.
Pezeshk, S., Camp, C. V., and Chen, D. (2000). “Design of nonlinear framed structures using genetic optimization.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(3), 382–388.
Sadek, E. A. (1992). “Optimization of structures having general cross-sectional relationships using an optimality criterion method.” Comput. Struct., 43(5), 959–969.
Saka, M. P. (1980). “Optimum design of rigidly jointed frames.” Comput. Struct., 11(5), 411–419.
Sedaghati, R., and Esmailzadeh, E. (2003). “Optimum design of structures with stress and displacement constraints using the force method.” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 45(8), 1369–1389.
Soegiarso, R., and Adeli, H. (1997). “Optimum load and resistance factor design of steel space-frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(2), 184–192.
Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. (2002). ANSYS 7.0 user’s manual, Canonsburg, Pa.
Wang, Q., and Arora, J. S. (2005). “Alternate formulations for structural optimization: Application to trusses.” AIAA J., 43(10), 2202–2209.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132Issue 12December 2006
Pages: 1880 - 1889

History

Received: May 20, 2004
Accepted: Apr 13, 2006
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Note. Associate Editor: Christopher M. Foley

Authors

Affiliations

Qian Wang, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Assistant, Optimal Design Lab, CCAD, College of Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: [email protected]
Jasbir S. Arora, F.ASCE [email protected]
F. Wendell Miller Distinguished Professor of Engineering, Optimal Design Lab, CCAD, College of Engineering, The Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share