Exposure Categories and Transitions for Design Wind Loads
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 11
Abstract
One of the greatest sources of uncertainty in the calculation of wind loads occurs in the selection of the wind exposure. This paper compares the traditional power-law exposure–coefficient curves used in North American codes and standards such as ASCE 7-02, 2002, with curves derived from modern models of the planetary boundary. It is concluded that the traditional exposure coefficients are reasonably consistent with modern boundary layer theory for heights below about . Above that height the traditional exposure coefficients increasingly depart from modern theory. The paper also examines the relationship between the dimensions and density of ground roughness obstacles and the exposure coefficient. This relationship enables a more objective assessment to be made than by the typical method of judging exposure “by eye,” at least where the ground roughness is fairly uniform. However, many sites are affected by upwind changes in ground roughness. Simple expressions, suitable for use in a building code or standard, are proposed for calculating the effect of an upwind change in roughness on the exposure coefficient.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASCE. (2003). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE 7-02, Reston, Va.
Australian/New Zealand Standard. (2002). “Structural design actions. Part 2: Wind actions.” AS/NZS 1170.2:2002, Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
British Standard Institute (BSI) Australia. (1995). “British standard, loading for buildings. Part 2: Code of practice for wind loads.” BS 6399, London, U.K.
Deaves, D. M. (1981a). “Computations of wind flow over changes in surface roughness.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 7, 66–94.
Deaves, D. M. (1981b). “Terrain dependence of longitudinal R.M.S. velocities in the neutral atmosphere” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 8, 259–274.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Tekie, P. B. (1997). “Wind load statistics for probability based structural design.” Rep. Prepared for the National Association of Home Builders, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Johns Hopkins Univ., Washington, D.C.
Engineering Sciences Data Unit International (ESDU). (1993). Strong winds in the atmospheric boundary layer. Part 2: Discrete gust speeds, Item 83045, Issued November 1983 with Amendments A and B April 1993, ESDU International, London, U.K.
European Prestandard. (1995). “Basis of design and actions on structures. Part 2-4: Actions on structures—Wind actions.” Eurocode 1, ENV 1991-2-4, Brussels, Belgium.
Harris, R. I., and Deaves, D. M. (1981). “The structure of strong winds.” Proc., CIRIA Conf. London, Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, Paper No. 4.
Lettau, H. (1969). “Note on aerodynamic roughness parameter estimation on the basis of roughness element description.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 8, 828–832.
National Building Code of Canada. (2005). “Canadian commission on building and fire codes.” National Research of Canada, NR24-5/1-2005E, Ottawa, Canada.
Raymer, W. G. (1962). “Wind resistance of conifers.” Aero Rep. 1008, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, U.K.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H. (1986). Wind effects on structures: An introduction to wind engineering, 2nd Ed., Chap. 2, Wiley, New York.
Wooding, R. A., Bradley, E. F., and Marshall, J. K. (1973). “Drag due to regular arrays of roughness elements of varying geometry.” Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 5, 285.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 11, 2002
Accepted: Nov 17, 2005
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.