TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2006

Seismic Response and Damage Detection Analyses of an Instrumented Steel Moment-Framed Building

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 10

Abstract

The seismic performance of steel moment-framed buildings has been of particular interest since brittle fractures were discovered at the beam–column connections in a number of buildings following the M 6.7 Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994. A case study of the seismic behavior of an extensively instrumented 13-story steel moment frame building located in the greater Los Angeles area of California is described herein. Response studies using frequency domain, joint time–frequency, system identification, and simple damage detection analyses are performed using an extensive strong motion dataset dating from 1971 to the present, supported by engineering drawings and results of postearthquake inspections. These studies show that the building’s response is more complex than would be expected from its highly symmetrical geometry. The response is characterized by low damping in the fundamental mode, larger accelerations in the middle and lower stories than at the roof and base, extended periods of vibration after the cessation of strong input shaking, beating in the response, elliptical particle motion, and significant torsion during strong shaking at the top of the concrete piers which extend from the basement to the second floor. The analyses conducted indicate that the response of the structure was elastic in all recorded earthquakes to date, including Northridge. Also, several simple damage detection methods employed did not indicate any structural damage or connection fractures. The combination of a large, real structure and low instrumentation density precluded the application of many recently proposed advanced damage detection methods in this case study. Overall, however, the findings of this study are consistent with the limited code-compliant postearthquake intrusive inspections conducted after the Northridge earthquake, which found no connection fractures or other structural damage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the input of the following persons: Chris Stephens and Roy Tam of the USGS National Strong Motion Program Data Center, Ahmet Sanli of Uzun and Case Engineers, Howard Bundock of USGS, Steven Cloke and Michael Cholakian of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Albert Chen of Black and Veatch, Inc., and James Anderson of the University of Southern California.

References

Black, C. J. (1998). “Dynamic analysis of civil engineering structures using joint time-frequency methods.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brinker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P. (2000). “Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition.” Proc., 18th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, Conn.
Çelebi, M. (1998). “The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989—Building structures.” Prof. Paper 1552-C, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
Cohen, J. M. (1996). “Seismic vulnerability analysis of steel framing with deep spandrel beams.” Prof. Paper 96-16, Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council, Los Angeles.
De la Llera, J. C., and Chopra, A. K. (1998). “Evaluation of seismic code provisions using strong motion building records from the 1994 Northridge earthquake.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC–97/16, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Doebling, S. W., and Farrar, C. R. (1997). “Using statistical analysis to enhance modal-based damage identification.” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures, Proc., Int. Conf. Damage Assessment of Struct. (DAMAS ’97), Univ. of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K., 199–210.
Dunand, F. (2005). “Pertinence du bruit de fond sismique pour la caractérisation dynamique et l’aide au diagnostic sismique de structures de génie civil.” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France (in French).
Dunand, F., Rodgers, J. E., Acosta, A. V., Salsman, M., Bard, P.-Y., and Çelebi, M. (2004). “Ambient vibration and earthquake strong-motion data sets for selected USGS extensively instrumented buildings.” Open-File Rep. No. 2004-1375, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
FEMA. (1995). “Interim guidelines, inspection, evaluation, repair, upgrade and design of welded moment resisting steel structures.” FEMA-267, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Fritzen, C. P., and Boehle, K. (1999a). “Identification of damage in large-scale structures by means of measured FRFs—Procedure and applications to the I40 highway bridge.” Damage Assessment of Structures, Proc., Int. Conf. Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS ’99), Dublin, Ireland, U.K., 310–319.
Fritzen, C. P., and Boehle, K. (1999b). “Parameter selection strategies in model-based damage detection.” Proc., Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 901–911.
Ghanem, R., and Shinozuka, M. (1995). “Structural system identification. I: Theory.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(2), 255–264.
Goel, R. K. (2004). “Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures using strong-motion building records.” Proc., SMIP04 Seminar, California Geological Survey, Sacramento, Calif.
Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K. (1997). “Vibration properties of buildings determined from recorded earthquake motions.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC–97/14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Hou, Z., Noori, M., and St. Amand, R. (2000). “Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(7), 677–683.
International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). (1967). Uniform building code, Whittier, Calif.
Kim, H., and Melhem, H. (2003). “Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis.” Eng. Struct., 26, 347–362.
Li, Y., and Mau, S. T. (1997). “Learning from recorded earthquake motion of buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 62–69.
Ljung, L. (1987). System identification: Theory for the user, Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Lopez-Diaz, J., Cuerno-Rejado, C., Luengo, P., and Alexiou, K. (2000). “Error location in mass and stiffness distribution for finite element models of spacecraft structures.” Proc., European COST F3 Conf. System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, COST, Madrid, Spain, 699–708.
Luco, J. E., Trifunac, M. D., and Wong, H. L. (1987). “On apparent changes in dynamic behavior of a nine-story reinforced concrete building.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 77(6), 1961–1983.
Maeck, J., and De Roeck, G. (1999). “Damage detection on a prestressed concrete bridge and RC beams using dynamic system identification.” Damage Assessment of Structures, Proc., Int. Conf. Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS ’99), Dublin, Ireland, U.K., 320–327.
Masri, S. F., Smyth, A. W., Chassiakos, A. G., Caughey, T. K., and Hunter, N. F. (2000). “Application of neural networks for detection of changes in nonlinear systems.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(7), 666–676.
The MathWorks Inc. (1988). MATLAB, Natick, Mass.
Nakamura, M., Masri, S. F., Chassiakos, A. G., and Caughey, T. K. (1998). “A method for non-parametric damage detection through the use of neural networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27, 997–1010.
Papadimitriou, C., Levine-West, M., and Milman, M. (1997). “Structural damage detection using modal test data.” Proc., Struct. Health Monitoring, Current Status and Perspectives, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 678–689.
Paret, T. F. (2000). “The W1 issue. I: Extent of weld fracturing during Northridge earthquake.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 10–18.
Rodgers, J. E., and Çelebi, M. (2005). “A proposed method for the detection of connection fractures in steel moment frames using recorded accelerations.” Open-File Rep. No. 2005-1375, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
Rodgers, J. E., and Mahin, S. A. (2006). “Effects of connection fractures on global behavior of steel moment frames subjected to earthquakes.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(1), 78–88.
Rodgers, J. E., Sanli, A. K., and Çelebi, M. (2004). “Seismic response analysis of a 13-story steel moment-framed building in Alhambra, California.” Open-file Rep. No. 2004-1338, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
Ruotolo, R., and Surace, C. (1998). “Diagnosis of damage in a steel frame.” Proc., 16th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, Conn., 609–615.
Sanli, A. K., and Çelebi, M. (2002). “Earthquake damage detection of a thirteen story building using recorded responses.” Proc., 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Shinozuka, M., and Ghanem, R. (1995). “Structural system identification. II: Experimental verification.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(2), 265–273.
Sohn, H., Farrar, C. R., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D. D., Stinemates, D. W., and Nadler, B. R. (2003). “A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001.” Rep. No. LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
Stephens, C. D., and Boore, D. M. (2004). “ANSS/NSMP strong-motion record processing and procedures.” Proc., COSMOS Invited Workshop on Record Processing Guidelines, Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems, Richmond, Calif.
Stubbs, N., Sikorsky, C., Park, S. C., and Bolton, R. (1999). “Verification of a methodology to nondestructively evaluate the structural properties of bridges.” Proc., Struct. Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 440–449.
Trifunac, M. D., Ivanovic, S. S., and Todorovska, M. I. (2001). “Apparent periods of a building. I: Fourier analysis.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(5), 517–526.
Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B. (1993). “Subspace algorithm for the stochastic identification problem.” Automatica, 29(3), 649–660.
Walker, J. S. (1999). A primer on wavelets and their scientific applications, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132Issue 10October 2006
Pages: 1543 - 1552

History

Received: Oct 15, 2004
Accepted: Oct 10, 2005
Published online: Oct 1, 2006
Published in print: Oct 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Note. Associate Editor: Ahmet Emin Aktan

Authors

Affiliations

Janise E. Rodgers, M.ASCE
Project Manager, GeoHazards International, 200 Town and Country Village, Palo Alto, CA 94301 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mehmet Çelebi, M.ASCE
Manager, Structural Monitoring, U.S. Geological Survey, MS977, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share