Damage Mechanics Modeling of Nonlinear Seismic Behavior of Concrete Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 6
Abstract
Performance-based design of structures is becoming the preferred seismic design method. Its use requires special numerical programs capable of predicting the performance of structures during a seismic event well into the nonlinear range. Seismic analysis results obtained from these programs depend on the types of elements and constitutive material laws used. For one type of element used, the results can be sensitive to the size of the elements. This paper presents a simplified finite-element analysis program based on multilayer elements and damage mechanics modeling of concrete behavior. A method to identify the various parameters required to define the behavior of the different materials is presented and some guidance on structural modeling using this type of program is provided. This program is used to predict the behavior of three different structures: overreinforced normal-strength concrete and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams tested monotonically, HSC columns tested under constant axial load and cyclic flexure, and bridge piers subjected to earthquake-type loading by the pseudodynamic test method. It is shown that predictions are in excellent agreement with experimental results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. They would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which have helped clarify the paper.
References
Bažant, Z. P. (1979). “Advanced topics in inelasticity and failure of concrete.” Gotab, Stockholm.
Coleman, J., and Spacone, E. (2001). “Localization issues in force-based frame elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(11), 1257–1265.
Cusson, D., and Paultre, P. (1995). “Stress–strain model for confined high-strengh concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(3), 468–477.
Dodd, L. L., and Cooke, N. (1994). “The dynamic behaviour of reinforced-concrete bridge piers subjected to New Zealand seismicity.” Research Rep. No. 92-04, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997). “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” Rep. No. FEMA 273, FEMA, Washington, D.C.
La Borderie, C. (1991). “Unilateral phenomena in a damageable material: modelling and application to the analysis of concrete structures.” PhD thesis, Univ. Paris VI, Laboratoire de Mécanique et de Technologie, Cachan, France (in French).
Légeron, F. (1998). “Seismic behavior of structures made with normal and high-performance concrete.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Sherbrooke and École Nationale de Ponts et Chaussés, Sherbrooke, and Paris (in French).
Légeron, F., Mazars, J., and Paultre, P. (1998). “Prediction of the behaviour of over-reinforced concrete beams with damage model and a simplified approach.” Proc., Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (FRAMCOS 3), Gifu, Japon, AEDIFICATIO, Freiburg, Germany.
Légeron, F., and Paultre, P. (2000). “Behavior of high-strength concrete columns Under Cyclic Flexure and Constant Axial Load.” ACI Struct. J., 97(4), 591–601.
Légeron, F., and Paultre, P. (2003). “Uniaxial confinement model for normal and high-strength concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(2), 241–252.
Li, B., Park, R., and Tanaka, H. (1994). “Strength and ductility of reinforced concrete members and frames constructed using HSC.” Research Rep. No. 94-5, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Mazars, J. (1986). “A description of micro and macroscale damage of concrete structures.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 25(5/6), 729–737.
Mazars, J., Kotronis, P., and Davenne, L. (2002). “A new modeling strategy for the behavior of walls under dynamic loading.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 937–954.
Mazars, J., Ramtani, S., and Berhaud, Y. (1989). “An experimental procedure to delocalize tensile failure and to identify the unilateral effect of tensile damage.” Cracking and damage—Strain localization and size effect, J. Mazars and Z. P. Bašant, eds., Elsevier Science, London, 55–64.
Paultre, P., Légeron, F., and D. Mongeau (2001). “Influence of concrete strength and transverse reinforcement yield strength on the behavior of high-strength concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 98(4), 490–501.
Pinto, A. V., Verzeletti, G., Pegon, P., Magonette, G., Negro, P., and Guedes, J. (1996). “Pseudodynamic testing of large-scale R/C bridges.” Rep. No. EUR 16378 EN, European Laboratory for Structural Assessment, Ispra, Italy.
Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
Ragueneau, F. (1999). “Dynamic behavior of concrete structures—Influence of local hysteretic behavior.” PhD thesis, Univ. Paris VI, Laboratoire de Mécanique et de Technologie, Cachan, France (in French).
Ramtani, S., Berthaud, Y., and Mazars, J. (1992). “Orthotropic behavior of concrete with directional aspects: modelling and experiments.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 133, 97–111.
Van Mier, J. G. M., and Ulfkjaer, J. P. (2000). “Round robin analysis of over-reinforced concrete beams—Comparison of results.” Mater. Struct., 33(230), 381–390.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1986). “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J., 83(2), 219–231.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 23, 2003
Accepted: Nov 19, 2004
Published online: Jun 1, 2005
Published in print: Jun 2005
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Khalid M. Mosalam
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.