Multiobjective Maintenance Planning Optimization for Deteriorating Bridges Considering Condition, Safety, and Life-Cycle Cost
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 5
Abstract
Many of the currently available bridge management system tools focus on minimizing life-cycle maintenance cost of deteriorating bridges while imposing constraints on structural performance. The computed single optimal maintenance planning solution, however, may not necessarily meet a bridge manager’s specific requirements on lifetime bridge performance. In this paper the life-cycle maintenance planning of deteriorating bridges is formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem that treats the lifetime condition and safety levels as well as life-cycle maintenance cost as separate objective functions. A multiobjective genetic algorithm is used as the search engine to automatically locate a large pool of different maintenance scenarios that exhibits an optimized tradeoff among conflicting objectives. This tradeoff provides improved opportunity for bridge managers to actively select the final maintenance scenario that most desirably balances life-cycle maintenance cost, condition, and safety levels of deteriorating bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers gratefully acknowledge the partial financial support of the U.K. Highways Agency and of the U.S. National Science Foundation through Grant Nos. CMS-9912525 and CMS-0217290. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.
References
Balling, R. J., Taber, J. T., Brown, M. R., and Day, K. (1999). “Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 125(2), 86–99.
Deb, K. (2001). Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2001). “Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states.” J. Bridge Eng., 6(6), 523–528.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Frangopol, D. M., and Neves, L. C. (2003). “Life-cycle maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures based on multiple probabilistic performance indicators.” System-based vision for strategic and creative design, F. Bontempi, ed., Vol. 1, Sweets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, 3–9.
Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Fukuda, Y., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: Life cycle cost vs. safety level vs. service life.” Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Assessment, design and management, D. M. Frangopol, E. Brühwiler, M. H. Faber, and B. Adey, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 19–25.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Hawk, H., and Small, E. P. (1998). “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 8(4), 309–314.
Highways Agency Standard for Bridge Assessment. (2001). “The assessment of highway bridge structures.” DB12/01, London.
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2003). “Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(6), 818–828.
Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K. (2005a). “Genetic algorithm based construction-conscious minimum weight design of seismic steel moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng., in press.
Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K. (2005b). “Multiobjective optimization for performance based seismic design of steel moment frame structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(3), 289–306.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction.” Eng. Struct., 26(7), 991–1002.
Liu, M. and Frangopol, D. M. (2005a). “Bridge annual maintenance prioritization under uncertainty by multiobjective combinatorial optimization.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., accepted.
Liu, M. and Frangopol, D. M. (2005b). “Balancing connectivity reliability of deteriorating bridge networks and long-term maintenance costs through optimization.” J. Bridge Eng., in press.
Liu, C., Hammad, A., and Itoh, Y. (1997). “Multiobjective optimization of bridge deck rehabilitation using a genetic algorithm.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 12, 431–443.
Liu, M., Wen, Y. K., and Burns, S. A. (2004). “Life cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference.” Eng. Struct., 26, 1407–1421.
Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., and Nakamura, H. (2000). “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15, 45–55.
Neves, L. C. and Frangopol, D. M. (2005). “Condition, safety and cost profiles for deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” Reliability engineering & system safety, Elsevier, New York, in press.
Petcherdchoo, A., Neves, L. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Combinations of probabilistic maintenance actions for minimum life-cycle cost of deteriorating bridges.” Bridge maintenance, safety, management and cost, E. Watanabe, D. M. Frangopol, and T. Utsunomiya, eds. (CD ROM), Balkema, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thompson, P., Small, E., Johnson, M., and Marshall, A. (1998). “The Pontis bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 8(4), 303–308.
Tilly, G. P. (1997). “Principles of whole life costing.” Safety of bridges, P. C. Das, ed, Thomas Telford, London, 138–144.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 11, 2003
Accepted: Sep 24, 2004
Published online: May 1, 2005
Published in print: May 2005
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Christopher M. Foley
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.