Stiffness and Deflection of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams under Negative Bending
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 11
Abstract
Compared with simply supported beams, continuous steel–concrete composite beams have many advantages such as higher span/depth ratio, less deflection, and higher fundamental frequency of vibration due to its higher stiffness. However, in negative bending regions near interior supports, tension in concrete is unfavorable and a complicated issue, which deserves a special study. In this paper, a mechanics model based on elastic theory was established to investigate the stiffness of composite beams in negative bending regions by considering slips at the steel beam–concrete slab interface and concrete–reinforcement interface. In order to validate this approach, a test of three composite beams with profiled sheeting under negative bending was conducted. Meanwhile, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis was conducted to investigate the general behavior of the tested specimens. In addition, a comparative analysis between results derived from the analytical model, laboratory test, and FE analysis was performed. The results show that slip always exists for composite beams under negative bending even with complete shear connection (full composite action) between the steel and concrete components. The slip effect results in an additional curvature of beam bending and reduces the section stiffness by 10–20% compared with that of a beam without any slip in serviceability condition. This reduction should be considered in designing process especially for cantilever beams. Formulae under other loading cases and boundary conditions were also proposed. The results can serve as a basis for further study on stiffness of continuous steel–concrete composite beams and can directly be used for the deflection calculation of cantilever beams.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Comite Euro-International du Beton (CEB-FIP). (1993). “CEB-FIP model code 1990.” Bulletin D’Information No. 213/214 (Concrete Structures), Lausanne, Switzerland.
2.
Daniels, J. H., and Fisher, J. W. (1967). “Static behaviour of continuous composite beams.” Fritz Eng. Lab. Rep. No. 324.2, Lehigh Univ., Bethleham, Pa.
3.
European Committee for Standardization (ECS). (1994). “Design of composite steel and concrete structures.” Eurocode 4, Brussels, Belgium.
4.
Fabbrocino, G., Manfredi, G., and Cosenza, E. (2000). “Analysis of continuous composite beams including partial interaction and bond.” J. Struct. Eng. 126(11), 1288–1294.
5.
Jasim, N. A. (1999). “Deflections of partially composite beams with linear connector density.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 49(3), 241–254.
7.
Johnson, R. P., Greenwood, R. D., and Van Dalen, K. (1969). “Stud shear-connectors in hogging moment regions of composite beams.” Struct. Eng., 47(9), 345–350.
9.
Kachlakev, D.I. et al. (2001). “Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete structures strengthened with FRP laminates.” Final Rep. No. FHWA-OR-RD-01-XX, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Oregon DOT, Salem, Ore.
10.
Kohnke, P. (1998). ANSYS 5.5. Theory reference manual, 8th ed.
11.
Manfredi, G., Fabbrocino, G., and Cosenza, E. (1999). “Modeling of steel–concrete composite beams under negative bending.” J. Eng. Mech. 125(6), 654–662.
12.
Mottram, J. T., and Johnson, R. P. (1990). “Push tests on studs welded through profiled steel sheeting.” Struct. Eng., 68(5), 187–193.
13.
Newmark, N. M., Siess, C. P., and Viest, I. M. (1951). “Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction.” Proc. Soc. Exp. Stress Anal., 9(1), 75–92.
14.
Nie, J. G., and Cai, C. S. (2003). “Steel–concrete composite beams considering shear slip effects.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(4), 495–506.
15.
Ollgaard, J. G., Slutter, R. G., and Fisher, J. W. (1971). “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete.” AISC Eng. J., 8(2), 55–64.
16.
Rex, C. O., and Eastening, W. S. (2000). “Behavior and modeling of reinforced composite slab in tension.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(7), 764–771.
17.
Salari, M. R., Spacone, E., Shing, P. B., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998). “Nonlinear analysis of composite beams with deformable shear connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 124(10), 1148–1158.
18.
Wang, Y. C. (1998). “Deflection of steel-concrete composite beams with partial shear interaction.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(10), 1159–1165.
19.
Wright, H. D. (1990). “The deformation of composite beams with discrete flexible connection.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 15(1–2), 49–64.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.