Seismic Design of Columns of Short Bridges Accounting for Embankment Flexibility
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 10
Abstract
Empirical observations and analysis of the recorded response of two California bridges indicate that the flexibility of the bridge embankments has a significant effect on the displacement demands sustained by the columns of short bridges under seismic excitation. Because the deck and abutments provide a capable load path, the columns only need to maintain gravity load support while accommodating the lateral displacement demands associated with the response of the embankments. This is in contrast to conventional (or ) factor approaches, which require the columns to provide substantial lateral resistance and, hence, lead to relatively large diameter columns that have limited displacement capacity. A displacement-based approach to the design of the columns is proposed. Displacement demand is assessed for one or multiple performance objectives using a simple extension of the “N2” model to address the nonlinear response of the embankments. Relative to conventional designs, the smaller diameter columns obtained with this approach have better seismic performance. The columns have a larger displacement capacity and sustain less damage because they have larger yield displacements. The columns also are much less vulnerable to shear failures because of their more slender aspect ratios. Normalized embankment capacity curves are provided, and their use is illustrated with an example.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). ( 1996). “Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges: Provisional recommendations.” Rep. No. ATC-32, Redwood City, Calif.
2.
Aschheim, M. A., and Black, E. F. (2000). “Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), 317–335.
3.
Aschheim, M., Black, E., and Cuesta, I. (2002). “Theory of principal components analysis and applications to multistory frame buildings responding to seismic excitation.” Eng. Struct., 24(8), 1091–1103.
4.
Bing, L., Park, R., and Tanaka, H. (2001). “Stress–strain behavior of high-strength concrete confined by ultra-high- and normal-strength transverse reinforcements.” ACI Struct. J., 98(3), 395–406.
5.
Caltrans (1995). “Bridge design specifications.” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
6.
Caltrans (1999). “Caltrans memo to designers (MTD) 20-1.” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
7.
Caltrans (1999). “Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.1.” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
8.
Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (1999). “Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum.” Earthquake Spectra, 15(4), 637–656.
9.
Fajfar, P. (1999). “Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(9), 979–993.
10.
Fajfar, P., and Gaspersic, P. ( 1998). “A simplified nonlinear method for seismic evaluation of RC bridges.” Proc., 6th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle.
11.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ( 2000). “Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” Rep. No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ( 2001). “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures.” Rep. No. FEMA-368, Washington, D.C.
13.
Hernández Montes, E., and Aschheim, M. A. (2003). “Estimates of the yield curvature for design of reinforced concrete columns.” Mag. Concrete Res., 55(4), 373–383.
14.
Inel, M. ( 2002). “Displacement-based strategies for the performance-based seismic design of short bridges considering embankment flexibility.” PhD. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
15.
McCallen, D. B., and Romstad, K. M. (1994). “Dynamic analyses of a skewed short-span, box-girder overpass.” Earthquake Spectra, 10(4), 729–755.
16.
Mei, H., Kiousis, P. D., Ehsani, M. R., and Saadatmanesh, H. (2001). “Confinement effects on high-strength concrete.” ACI Struct. J., 98(4), 548–553.
17.
Panagiotakos, T. B., and Fardis, M. N. (2001). “Deformation of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate.” ACI Struct. J., 98(2), 135–148.
18.
Paultre, P., Legeron, F., and Mongeau, D. (2001). “Influence of concrete strength and transverse reinforcement yield strength on behavior of high-strength concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 98(4), 490–501.
19.
Prakash, V., Powell, G.H., and Campbell, S. ( 1993). Drain-2DX base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Structural Engineering Mechanics and Materials Rep. No. UCB/SEMM-93-18, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
20.
Priestley, M. J. N. (1998). “Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and significance to seismic design.” Bull. New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(4), 246–259.
21.
Priestley, M.J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M. S. ( 1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
22.
Saiidi, M. S., Moore, R. T., and Itani, A. (2001). “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridges with unconventional configurations.” ACI Struct. J., 98(5), 717–726.
23.
Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M., and Tokimatsi, K. ( 1984). “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC-84/14, Prepared for Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
24.
Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R., and Seed, H.B. ( 1988). “Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC-88-15, Prepared for Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
25.
Werner, S. D., Beck, J. L., and Levine, M. B. (1987). “Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road Overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley Earthquake records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15, 249–274.
26.
Werner, S.D., Beck, J.L., and Nisar, A. ( 1990). “Dynamic tests and seismic excitation of a bridge structure.” Proc., 4th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, Palm Springs, Calif., 1037–1046.
27.
Wissawapaisal, C., and Aschheim, M.A. ( 2000). Modeling the transverse response of short bridges subjected to earthquakes, Release 0005 (CD ROM), Mid-America Earthquake Center, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.