Life-Cycle Reliability-Based Maintenance Cost Optimization of Deteriorating Structures with Emphasis on Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 6
Abstract
The assessment of the current state and the prediction of the future condition of deteriorating structures are crucial processes in the management of civil infrastructure systems. Not only time-varying loads and resistances but also a series of maintenance interventions that are applied to keep structural systems safe and serviceable make the prediction process very difficult. In order to perform a realistic life-cycle analysis of deteriorating structures under different maintenance scenarios the uncertainties involved in this process have to be considered. This paper considers these uncertainties by providing a reliability-based framework and shows that the identification of the optimum maintenance scenario is a straightforward process. This is achieved by using a computer program for Life-Cycle Analysis of Deteriorating Structures (LCADS). This program can consider the effects of various types of actions on the reliability index profile of a group of deteriorating structures. Only the effect of maintenance interventions is considered in this study. However, any environmental or mechanical action affecting the reliability index profile can be considered in LCADS. Most input data are represented by random variables. In this manner, the uncertainties included in maintenance interventions, reliability index profiles, and cost evaluations are all taken into account. The present value of the expected cumulative cost associated with maintenance interventions can be evaluated for both an individual structure and a group of similar structures. Optimization and parametric analysis modules help the identification of the maintenance strategy that best balance cost and reliability index profile over a specified time horizon. Numerical examples of deteriorating bridges are presented to illustrate the capability of the proposed approach. Further development and implementation of this approach are recommended for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Aktan, A. E., Farhey, D. N., Brown, D. L., Dalal, V., Helmicki, A. J., Hunt, V. J., and Shelley, S. J.(1996). “Condition assessment for bridge management.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 2(3), 108–117.
Chan, H. Y., and Melchers, R. E.(1993). “A simulation method for time-dependent structural reliability.” Comput. Struct., 49(6), 989–996.
Enright, M. P., and Frangopol, D. M.(1999). “Reliability-based condition assessment of deteriorating concrete bridges considering load redistribution.” Struct. Safety, 21(2), 159–195.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M.(2001). “Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states.” J. Bridge Eng., 6(6), 523–528.
Frangopol, D. M., and Kong, J. S. (2001). “Expected maintenance cost of deteriorating civil infrastructures.” Keynote paper in Life-cycle cost analysis and design of civil infrastructure systems, D. M. Frangopol and H. Furuta, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 22–47.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S.(2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Kong, J. S. (2001). “Lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2001). LCADS—user’s manual, reliability profile analysis program associated with multiple actions. Rep., Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colo.
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M.(2002). “Life-cycle performance prediction of steel/concrete composite bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct., 2(1), 13–19.
Maunsell Ltd. and Transport Research Laboratory. (1998). “Strategic review of bridge maintenance costs: Report on 1997/98 Review.” Draft Rep., The Highways Agency, London.
Maunsell Ltd. and Transport Research Laboratory. (1999). “Strategic review of bridge maintenance costs: Report on 1998 review.” Final Rep., The Highways Agency, London.
Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., and Nakamura, H.(2000). “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(1), 45–55.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. E.(1993). “Reliability-based service-life assessment of aging concrete structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(5), 1600–1621.
Nowak, A. S., Park, C.-H., and Szersen, M. M. (1997). “Revision of the bridge assessment rules based on whole life performance: Steel bridges.” Final Project Rep., The Highways Agency, London.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in FORTRAN-77: The art of scientific computing, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 116–122.
Reklaitis, G. V., Ravindran, A., and Ragsdell, K. M. (1983). Engineering optimization: Methods and applications, Wiley, New York, 471-480.
Thompson, P., Small, E., Johnson, M., and Marshall, A.(1998). “The Pontis Bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 8(4), 303–308.
Tilly, G. P. (1997). “Principles of whole life costing.” Safety of bridges, P. C. Das, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 138–144.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 129 • Issue 6 • June 2003
Pages: 818 - 828
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 20, 2001
Accepted: Jul 8, 2002
Published online: May 15, 2003
Published in print: Jun 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.