Behavior of Intermediate Transverse Stiffeners Attached on Web Panels
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 3
Abstract
Current AASHTO and AISC specifications require that an intermediate transverse stiffener attached on the shear web panel be designed not only to have a proper bending rigidity to meet the simply supported condition when the web panel buckles, but to have a proper area in order to resist the compression developed due to diagonal tension in the postbuckling range as well. However, the equation for the required areas, which was suggested by Basler in 1963 has been known to be conservative. According to recent studies, Basler’s assumption for the formulation of the design equation appears to be questionable. In this paper, the behavior of the transverse stiffeners is investigated through a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis. This finite element analysis gives results that are contrary to Basler’s questionable assumption. The transverse stiffener is not necessarily subjected to axial compression in the postbuckling stage, and therefore, the requirement for the minimum areas can be voided. A shear transfer model called “shear cell analogy” is presented in order to describe the postbuckling behavior of the shear web panel in a manner different from those in the literature to date. This analogy is also used to explain why axial compressive stresses do not develop in the transverse stiffeners.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHO. (1973). “Standard specifications for highway bridges.” 11th Ed., American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (1996). “Standard specifications for highway bridges.” 16th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
ADINA. (1999). Automatic dynamic incremental nonlinear analysis user manual, Adina R&D, Inc., Watertown, Mass.
AISC. (1963). “Specification for the design, fabrication and erection of structural steel for building.” 6th Ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, New York.
ANSI/AASHTO/AWS D1.5-96. (1996). “Bridge welding code.” A joint publication of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and American Welding Society, Washington, D.C., 1.5–96.
Basler, K.(1963). “Strength of plate girders in shear.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 128(11), 683–719.
Bjorhovde, R.(1980). “Research needs in stability of metal structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 106(12), 2425–2442.
Bleich, F. (1952). Buckling strength of metal structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ketchum, M.S. (1920). Design of highway bridges, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lee, S. C., Davidson, J. S., and Yoo, C. H.(1996). “Shear buckling coefficients of plate girder web panels.” Comput. Struct., 59(5), 789–795.
Lee, S. C., and Yoo, C. H.(1998). “Strength of plate girder web panels under pure shear.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(2), 184–194.
Lee, S. C., and Yoo, C. H.(1999). “Experimental study on ultimate shear strength of web panels.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(8), 838–846.
Marsh, C., Ajam, W., and Ha, H.(1988). “Finite element analysis of postbuckled shear webs.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(7), 1571–1587.
SSRC. (1998). “Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures.” 5th Ed., T. V. Galambos, ed., Structural Stability Research Council, Wiley, New York.
Wagner, H. (1931). “Flat sheet metal girder with very thin metal web.” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), Tech. Memo. Nos. 604, 605, 606.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 9, 2000
Accepted: Sep 7, 2001
Published online: Mar 1, 2002
Published in print: Mar 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.