Behavior and Modeling of Nonprismatic Members Having T-Sections
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 8
Abstract
This paper emphasizes the discrepancies in conventional methods of analyzing nonprismatic members having T-sections. In practice, the change in the location of the centroidal axis over the length of nonprismatic members is ignored in structural analysis. Commonly used Portland Cement Association tables for fixed-end moment and stiffness factors are based on the assumptions of a straight-line centroidal axis and variable rectangular cross section. However, discontinuities in the centroidal axis produce strong coupling between the end moments and horizontal thrust. Nonprismatic members behave similar to an arch, and this creates an axial force that is neglected in conventional methods. Moreover, beams are considered as T-beams in the structural models because of the effect of RC slabs. Consequently, nonprismatic T-sections require special consideration in structural analysis. The purpose of this paper is to present the behavior of nonprismatic T-section beams based on a 3D finite-element investigation. Based on the results of parametric studies, a simple, practical 2D beam model with an effective length concept is proposed for the analysis of nonprismatic members having T-sections. In the proposed model, the effective length of the 2D beam element representing the haunch evolves as 75% of its actual length. It is concluded that the deviation in results from the results of the finite-element analysis is within 15%. Additionally, different modeling schemes in the analysis of frames with nonprismatic members using the proposed 2D beam representation are investigated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Balkaya, C. ( 1987). “Finite element investigation of beams of variable cross-section.” MS thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
2.
Balkaya, C., and Çitipitioğlu, E. (1997). “Discussion of `Stiffness formulation for nonprismatic beam elements,' by A. Tena-Colunga.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(12), 1694–1695.
3.
Cross, H., and Morgan, N. ( 1958). Continuous frames of reinforced concrete, 14th Ed., Wiley, New York, 126–155.
4.
El-Mezaini, N., Balkaya, C., and Çıtıpıtıoğlu, E. (1991). “Analysis of frames with nonprismatic beam elements.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(6), 1573–1592.
5.
Horowitz, B. ( 1997). “Singularities in elastic finite element analysis.” Concrete Int., December, 33–36.
6.
Maugh, L. C. ( 1964). Statically indeterminate structures: Continuous girders and frames with variable moment of inertia, Wiley, New York, 202–243.
7.
Portland Cement Association (PCA). ( 1958). “Beam factors and moment coefficients for members of variable cross-section.” Handbook of frame constants, Chicago.
8.
Tena-Colunga, A. (1996). “Stiffness formulation for nonprismatic beam elements.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 122(12), 1484–1489.
9.
Wilson, E. L., and Habibullah, A. ( 1992). “SAP90 computer programs for the finite element analysis of structures.” Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jun 23, 1997
Published online: Aug 1, 2001
Published in print: Aug 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.