Nonlinear Analysis of Self-Erecting Framework by Cable-Tensioning Technique
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 3
Abstract
Self-erecting structures eliminate the need for expensive scaffolding and are safer and faster to construct. This paper deals with the application of nonlinear analysis to study the erection of space trusses by tensioning of cables placed inside some chord members. Based on the study, the criteria and parameters that govern and influence the erection of a framework are identified. The arrangement of cables and the magnitude of tensioning forces need to be predetermined based on the final structural configuration to be achieved. A special program has been developed to examine the precise conditions under which self-erection is possible, and whether or not the erection process induces self-equilibrium internal stress states at each incremental step. Several examples, including square-grid and hexagonal-grid space trusses, have been considered for the study. It is found that Maxwell's rule governing the requirement of number of joints, members, and kinematic constraints at the supports of a structural assembly is not sufficient to determine the feasibility of erection by cable-tensioning. The proposed analysis technique and procedure is capable of simulating the erection process and, at the same time, monitoring the stability condition of the structure during the self-erecting process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Calladine, C. R. (1978). “Buckminster Fuller's tensegrity structures and Clerk Maxwell's rules for the construction of stiff frames.” Int. J. Solids and Struct., 14, 161–172.
2.
Chen, W. F., Goto, Y., and Liew, J. Y. R. (1996). Stability design of semi-rigid frames. Wiley, New York.
3.
Clarke, M. J. ( 1992). “The behaviour of stressed-arch frames,” PhD thesis, School of Civ. and Min. Engrg., University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
4.
Clarke, M. J., and Hancock, G. J. (1995). “Tests and nonlinear analyses of small-scale stressed-arch frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(2), 187–200.
5.
Dehdashti, G., and Schmidt, L. C. (1995). “Barrel-vault space trusses shaped by posttensioning.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(12), 1758–1764.
6.
Li, H., and Schmidt, L. C. (1996). “Shape formation and self-erection of hypar trusses.” Proc., Asia-Pacific Conf. on Shell and Spatial Struct., Beijing, 344–351.
7.
Li, H., and Schmidt, L. C. (1997). “Post-stressing of a pyramidal unit in a full-size space truss.” Proc., IASS 97 Symp. on Shell & Spatial Struct.: Des., Perf. & Economics, Singapore.
8.
Liew, J. Y. R., and Chen, W. F. ( 1994). “Chapter 1: A trend toward advanced analysis; and Chapter 4: Second-order plastic hinge analysis of Frames.” Advanced Anal. in Steel frames: Theory, Software and Applications, W. F. Chen and S. Toma, eds., CRC, Boca Raton, Fl., 1–45, 139–195.
9.
Liew, J. Y. R., Punniyakotty, N. M., and Shanmugam, N. E. (1997). “Advanced analysis and design of spatial structures.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 42(1), 21–48.
10.
Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings. (1993). 2nd Ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
11.
Pellegrino, S., and Calladine, C. R. (1986). “Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks.” Int. J. Solids and Struct., 22(4), 409–428.
12.
Saar, O. S. (1984). “Self-erecting two-layer steel prefabricated arch.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Space Struct., Elsevier, New York, 823–827.
13.
Schmidt, L. C. (1985). “Single-chorded plane space trusses.” Space structures 1, Elsevier, New York, 69–74.
14.
Schmidt, L. C., and Li, H. (1995a). “Geometric models of deployable metal domes.”J. Arch. Engrg., ASCE, 1(3), 115–120.
15.
Schmidt, L. C., and Li, H. (1995b). “Shape formation of deployable metal domes.” Int. J. Space Struct., 10(4), 189–194.
16.
Schmidt, L. C., Li, H., and Chua, M. (1996). “A hexagonal grid steel dome shaped by post-tensioning method.” Proc., Asia-Pacific Conf. on Shell and Spatial Struct., Beijing, 146–153.
17.
“Steel structures.” (1990). AS 4100, Standards Association of Australia, Australia Institute of Steel Construction, Sydney, Australia.
18.
“Structural use of steelwork in building. Part 1: Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction: Hot rolled section.” (1990). BS 5950, British Standards Institution, London.
19.
Tarnai, T. (1980). “Simultaneous static and kinematic indeterminacy of space trusses with cyclic symmetry.” Int. J. Solids and Stuct., 16, 347–359.
20.
Vilnay, O. (1981). “Determinate tensegric shell.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(10), 2029–2033.
21.
Vilnay, O., and Soh, S. S. (1982). “Tensegric shell behavior.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(8), 1831–1845.
22.
White, D. W., Liew, J. Y. R., and Chen, W. F. ( 1993). “Toward advanced analysis in LRFD.” Plastic hinge based methods for advanced analysis and design of steel frames—an assessment of the state-of-the-art, Struct. Stability Res. Council, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., 95–173.
23.
Yang, Y. B., and Kuo, S. R. (1994). Theory & analysis of nonlinear framed structures. Prentice-Hall, Singapore.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 3 • March 2000
Pages: 361 - 370
History
Received: Sep 30, 1998
Published online: Mar 1, 2000
Published in print: Mar 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.