Simulation of Hurricane Risk in the U.S. Using Empirical Track Model
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 10
Abstract
This paper describes a new technique for modeling hurricane risk in the United States. A storm track modeling approach is employed where, for each hurricane, the entire track as it crosses the ocean and makes landfall is modeled. The central pressure is modeled as a function of the sea surface temperature. The approach is validated through comparisons of simulated and observed key hurricane statistics (central pressure, translation speed, heading, and approach distance) along the U.S. coastline. The simulated and observed landfall rates of intense hurricanes (Saffir-Simpson Scale 3 and higher) also are compared on a regional basis along the coast. The model is able to reproduce the continuously varying hurricane climatology along the U.S. coastline, and it provides a rational means for examining the hurricane risk for geographically distributed systems such as transmission lines and insurance portfolios.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ( 1982). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ANSI A58.1, New York.
2.
ASCE. ( 1990). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-88, New York.
3.
ASCE. ( 1996). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-95, New York.
4.
Batts, M. E., Cordes, M. R., Russell, L. R., Shaver, J. R., and Simiu, E. ( 1980). “Hurricane wind speeds in the United States.” Rep. No. BSS-124, Nat. Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
5.
Caribbean Community Secretariat (CCS). ( 1985). “Structural design requirements: Wind load.” Caribbean uniform building code, Part 2, Sect. 2, Georgetown, Guyana.
6.
Chouinard, L. E., Liu, C., and Cooper, C. K. (1997). “Model for severity of hurricanes in Gulf of Mexico.”J. Wtrwy., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, 123(3), 120–129.
7.
Darling, R. W. R. ( 1991). “Estimating probabilities of hurricane wind speeds using a large-scale empirical model.” J. Climate, 4(10), 1035–1046.
8.
Emmanuel, K. A. ( 1988). “The maximum intensity of hurricanes.” J. Atmospheric Sci., 45, 1143–1155.
9.
Georgiou, P. N. ( 1985). “Design windspeeds in tropical cyclone-prone regions.” PhD thesis, Fac. of Engrg. Sci., University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada.
10.
Georgiou, P. N., Davenport, A. G., and Vickery, B. J. ( 1983). “Design wind speeds in regions dominated by tropical cyclones.” J. Wind Engrg. and Industrial Aerodynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 13(1), 139–152.
11.
Hebert, P. J., Jarrell, J. D., and Mayfield, B. M. ( 1997). “The deadliest, costliest, and most intense United States hurricanes of this century (and other frequently requested hurricane facts).” NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS-TPC-1. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
12.
Ho, F. P., Su, J. C., Hanevich, K. L., Smith, R. J., and Richards, F. P. ( 1987). “Hurricane climatology for the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States.” NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS38, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
13.
Holland, G. J. ( 1980). “An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.” Monthly Weather Rev., 108(8), 1212–1218.
14.
Houston, S. H., Powell, M. D., and Dodge, P. P. ( 1997). “Surface wind fields in 1996 Hurricanes Bertha and Fran at landfall.” Proc., 22nd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 92–93.
15.
Jarvinen, B. R., Neumann, C. J., and Davis, M. A. S. ( 1984). “A tropical cyclone data tape for the North Atlantic Basin 1886–1983: Contents, limitations and uses.” NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS-NHC-22, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
16.
Neumann, C. J. ( 1991). “The National Hurricane Center Risk Analysis Program (HURISK).” NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS-NHC-38, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
17.
Powell, M. D. ( 1987). “Changes in the low-level kinematic and thermodynamic structure of Hurricane Alicia (1983) of landfall.” Monthly Weather Rev., 115, 75–99.
18.
Powell, M. D., Dodge, P. P., and Black, L. B. ( 1991). “The landfall of Hurricane Hugo in the Carolinas: Surface wind distribution.” Weather and Forecasting, 6, 379–399.
19.
Powell, M. D., and Houston, S. H. ( 1996). “Hurricane Andrew's landfall in South Florida—Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time applications.” Weather and Forecasting, 11(3), 329–349.
20.
Powell, M. D., and Houston, S. H. ( 1998). “Surface wind fields of 1995 Hurricanes Erin, Opal, Luis, Marilyn, and Roxanne at landfall.” Monthly Weather Rev., 126, 1259–1273.
21.
Russell, L. R. ( 1968). “Probability distribution for Texas Gulf Coast hurricane effects of engineering interest.” PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
22.
Russell, L. R. (1971). “Probability distributions for hurricane effects.”J. Wtrwy., Harb. and Coast. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 97(1), 139–154.
23.
Standards Association of Australia (SAA). ( 1989). “Loading code, Part 2—Wind forces.” AS1170 Part 2, Sydney, Australia.
24.
Thompson, E. F., and Cardone, V. J. (1996). “Practical modeling of hurricane surface wind fields.”J. Wtrwy., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, 122(4), 195–205.
25.
Vickery, P. J., Skerlj, P. F., Steckley, A. C., and Twisdale, L. A. (2000). “Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 126(10), 1203–1222.
26.
Vickery, P. J., and Twisdale, L. A. (1995a). “Wind-field and filling models for hurricane wind-speed predictions.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(11), 1700–1709.
27.
Vickery, P. J., and Twisdale, L. A. (1995b). “Prediction of hurricane wind speeds in the United States.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(11), 1691–1699.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jan 26, 1998
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.