Static Strength of Axially Loaded Tubular K-Joints. II: Ultimate Capacity
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 2
Abstract
The ultimate capacity results from an extensive finite-element study of balanced axially loaded K-joints (reported in a companion paper) are reviewed and compared with predictions from available design guidance. Both overlap and small-gap K-joints are included. Overlapping the braces was shown to have a beneficial effect on joint strength for the joints with relatively thick brace walls, where the strength was found to be up to four and a half times that of the corresponding gap joint. The performance of the available onshore and offshore design guidance for predicting joint capacities was poor, particularly for the overlap joints. The interactive effects of varying geometric parameters are not fully accounted for, generally resulting in high levels of conservatism. A new strength equation developed for the overlap joints has been shown to predict the capacities of the numerical joints studied, as well as those from a test database, with a high degree of accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
API RP 2A: planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms . (1993) 20th Ed., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C.
2.
Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading . (1991). Comité International pour le Developpement et l'Étude de la Construction Tubulaire (CIDECT), Paris, France.
3.
Dexter, E M. ( 1996). “Effects of overlap on behaviour and strength of steel circular hollow section joints,” PhD thesis, University of Wales, Swansea, U.K.
4.
Dexter E. M., and Lee, M. M. K. (1999). “Static strength of axially loaded tubular K-joints. I: Behaviour.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 125(2), 194–201.
5.
Dexter E. M., Lee, M. M. K., and Kirkwood, M. G. ( 1996). “Overlap K joints in circular hollow sections under axial loading (an investigation of the factors affecting static strength using numerical modelling).” J. Offshore Mech. and Arctic Engrg., 118, 53–61.
6.
Healy, B. E. ( 1994). “A numerical investigation into the capacity of overlap circular K-joints.” Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Tubular Struct., Melbourne, Australia, 563–571.
7.
Kurobane, Y., Makino, Y., and Ochi, K. (1984). “Ultimate resistance of unstiffened tubular joints.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 385–400.
8.
Kurobane, Y., and Ochi, K. ( 1996). “AWS vs. international design rules for circular tubular K-connections.” Engrg. Struct., 19(3), 259–266.
9.
Kurobane, Y., Ogawa, K., Ochi, K., and Makino, Y. ( 1986). “Local buckling of braces in tubular K-joints.” Thin-Walled Struct., 23–40.
10.
Lalani, M. ( 1990). “Codification of tubular joints design practice—a plea for rationalisation.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mech. and Arctic Engrg., Vol. 3-B, Houston, Tex.
11.
Makino, Y., Kurobane, Y., Ochi, K., van der Vegte, G. J., and Wilmshurst, S. R. ( 1996). “Introduction to unstiffened CHS tubular joints database.” Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Tubular Structures, Miskolc, Hungary, 157–164.
12.
Offshore installations: guidance on design, construction and certification . 4th Ed., Health and Safety Executive, London.
13.
Yura, J. A., Zettlemoyer, N., and Edwards, I. F. ( 1980). “Ultimate capacity equations for tubular joints.” Offshore Technol. Conf. 3690, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Tex.
14.
Zettlemoyer, N. ( 1996). “ISO harmonisation of offshore guidance on strength of tubular joints.” Proc., 6th Int. Offshore and Polar Engrg. Conf., Los Angeles.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Aug 6, 1998
Published online: Feb 1, 1999
Published in print: Feb 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.