Behavior and Modeling of Wood-Pegged Timber Frames
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 1
Abstract
Traditional timber connections with wood pegs are encountered in the renovation and rehabilitation of historic wood structures and in the construction of new structures where rustic appearance and traditional methods are desired. This study examined four types of traditional connections: mortise and tenon, mortise and tenon with a shoulder, mortise and tenon with a shoulder and a knee brace, and fork and tongue. A total of 60 specimens, primarily white oak and Douglas fir, were tested. About a quarter of the specimens were assembled and allowed to season under simulated in-service load. All specimens were tested under simulated gravity load up to failure or to about five times typical design load. Some knee-braced specimens were retested to simulate lateral loads. Test results showed that joint behavior is primarily linear. A tightly fitting joint carries load with less peg damage than a loose joint allows. A mortise and tenon with a shoulder performs better than a mortise and tenon or a fork and tongue. At typical occupancy sustained live plus dead load levels, the effects of warping and checking caused by drying shrinkage overshadow any damage caused by the sustained load. Analysis of structures employing these connections requires that the behavior of the wood-pegged joints be included in a reasonable manner. In frames without knee braces, the joints can be modeled as pinned connections. In frames with knee braces, the post-to-beam and knee-brace connections can be modeled as pinned, although the reduction in effective axial stiffness of the knee brace caused by the wood pegs must be included. The effects of shear deformations should be incorporated into the analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bathe, K.-J., Wilson, E. L., and Peterson, F. E. ( 1973). SAP IV: a structural analysis program for static and dynamic response of linear systems. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va.
2.
Benson, T., and Gruber, J. ( 1980). Building the timber frame house . Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.
3.
Brungraber, R. L. ( 1985). “Traditional timber joinery: a modern analysis,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
4.
Bulleit, W. M., Sandberg, L. B., O'Bryant, T. L., Weaver, D. A., and Pattison, W. E. ( 1996). “Analysis of frames with traditional timber connections.” Proc., 1996 Int. Wood Engrg. Conf., Vol. 4, Omnipress, Madison, Wis., 232–239.
5.
Drewek, M. W. ( 1997). “Modeling the behavior of traditional timber frames,” MS thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
6.
Ghali, A., and Neville, A. M. ( 1972). Structural analysis: a unified classical and matrix approach . International Textbook Co., Scranton, Pa.
7.
Kessel, M. H., and Augustin, R. ( 1995a). “Load behavior of connections with pegs I.” M. Peavy and R. Schmidt, translators, Timber Framing, 38, 6–9.
8.
Kessel, M. H., and Augustin, R. ( 1995b). “Load behavior of connections with pegs II.” M. Peavy and R. Schmidt, translators, Timber Framing, 39, 8–10.
9.
Kessel, M. H., Speich, M., and Hinkes, F.-J. ( 1988). “The reconstruction of an eight-floor timber frame house at Hildesheim (FRG).” Proc., 1988 Int. Timber Engrg. Conf., Forest Products Research Society, Madison, Wis., 415–421.
10.
O'Bryant, T. L. ( 1996). “Modeling the behavior of pegged timber connections,” MS thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
11.
Reid, E. H. ( 1997). “Behavior of wood pegs in traditional timber frame connections,” MS thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
12.
Sandberg, L. B., Bulleit, W. M., O'Bryant, T. L., Postlewaite, J. J., and Schaffer, J. J. ( 1996). “Experimental investigation of traditional timber connections.” Proc., 1996 Int. Wood Engrg. Conf., Vol. 4, Omnipress, Madison, Wis., 225–231.
13.
SAP90: a series of computer programs for the finite element analysis of structures . (1992). Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
14.
Schmidt, R. J., and MacKay, R. B. ( 1997). Timber frame tension joinery . University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo.
15.
Supplement to the national design specification for wood construction . (1991). National Forest Products Association, Washington, D.C.
16.
Timber construction manual . (1994). 4th Ed., American Institute of Timber Construction, Englewood, Colo.
17.
Timber frame joinery and design workbook . (1995). Timber Framers Guild of North America, Bellingham, Wash.
18.
Weaver, D. A. ( 1993). “Modeling the behavior of traditionally connected timber frames,” MS thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jul 7, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 1999
Published in print: Jan 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.