Complex Notation in Flutter Analysis
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 8
Abstract
Flutter analysis in aircraft or bridge engineering has to include motion-induced aerodynamic forces. These forces are mathematically described in two equivalent ways, namely, by real number or complex number expressions. Accordingly, flutter analysis can be performed using either real or complex arithmetic. At first glance, the use of either kind of notation seems to be more a question of personal preference, as both lead to the same numerical results. Nevertheless, this paper attempts to advocate the use of complex notation both in aircraft and bridge flutter analysis. Real-number and complex-number descriptions of the same mechanical phenomena are compared. It is shown that, apart from computational advantages, complex notation leads to mathematically more compact and more elegant expressions, which is of significance particularly from an educational standpoint.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Klöppel, K., and Thiele, F.(1967). “Modellversuche im Windkanal zur Bemessung von Brücken gegen die Gefahr winderregter Schwingungen.”Der Stahlbau, Berlin, Germany, 36(12), 353–365.
2.
Miyata, T., and Yamada, H. (1996). “New ideas for detailed investigation on aerodynamic behaviors of long span suspension bridges.”15th Congr. of the Int. Assn. for Bridge and Struct. Engrg., Rep., Zurich, Switzerland, 81–86.
3.
Namini, A. H.(1991). “Analytical modeling of flutter derivatives as finite elements.”Comp. and Struct., 41(5), 1055–1064.
4.
Namini, A., Albrecht, P., and Bosch, H.(1992). “Finite element–based flutter analysis of cable-suspended bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(6), 1509–1526.
5.
Scanlan, R. H. (1992). “Wind dynamics of long-span bridges.”Aerodynamics of large bridges, A. Larsen, ed., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
6.
Scanlan, R. H., and Sabzevari, A. (1967). “Suspension bridge flutter revisited.”ASCE Struct. Engrg. Conf., Preprint 468.
7.
Starossek, U. (1991). “Brückendynamik—Winderregte Schwingungen von Seilbrücken,” PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlags-GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
8.
Starossek, U.(1993). “Prediction of bridge flutter through use of finite elements.”Struct. Engrg. Rev., Oxford, U.K., 5(4), 301–307.
9.
Szechenyi, E. (1973). “Etude du comportement aéroelastique du pont Saint-Nazaire à Saint-Brévin.”Document O.N.E.R.A., NT 2/3044 RY, France.
10.
Theodorsen, T. (1934). “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter.”Tech. Rep. No. 496, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C., 413–433.
11.
Ukeguchi, N., Sakata, H., and Nishitani, H. (1966). “An investigation of aeroelastic instability of suspension bridges.”Symp. on Suspension Bridges, Paper No. 11, Lisbon, Portugal.
12.
Virlogeux, M. (1989). “Un Pont de 3,000 mètres.”Bull. de l'Association Connaissance des Ouvrages d'Art, France, No. 3–4, 58–67.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 124 • Issue 8 • August 1998
Pages: 975 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1998
Published in print: Aug 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.