Seismic Evaluation of Brent-Spence Bridge
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 9
Abstract
This is the second part of a two-part paper on field testing and analytical studies related to seismic behavior of the Brent-Spence bridge. This part of the paper deals with seismic evaluation of the bridge, while the first part dealt with free and ambient vibration studies of the bridge by field testing and finite-element analysis. Site-specific ground motion scenarios are developed for the bridge to represent probable earthquakes that may occur in these seismic zones. The time histories of these events are then used in the seismic analysis of the main bridge and response spectra are used for analyzing the approach spans. A three-dimensional finite-element model of the main bridge was subjected to the time histories to determine maximum responses (displacements, forces, and stresses). The seismic analysis of approach spans dealt only with the potential for loss of span due to excessive longitudinal displacement along the highway main line. For the maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 8.5 Ms (7.3 mb,Lg) on the Richter scale at New Madrid, the seismic evaluation indicates that the main bridge will survive the earthquake in the elastic range without significant damage and no loss of span. The approach spans are found to be vulnerable to loss of span failure in the 8.5 Ms event.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Boore, D. M.(1983). “Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 73, 1865–1894.
2.
Buckle, I. G., Mayes, R. L., and Button, M. R. (1987). “Seismic design and retrofit manual for highway bridges.”Rep. No. FHWA-IP-87-6 Prepared by Computech Engrg. Services, Inc., for Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
3.
Chiu, J. M., Johnston, A. C., and Yang, Y. T.(1992). “Imaging the active faults of the central New Madrid seismic zone using PANDA array data,”Seismological Res. Letters, 63(3), 375–393.
4.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of structures, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Drake, D. (1815). “Natural and statistical view, a picture of Cincinnati and the Miami country, illustrated by maps, with an appendix, containing observations on the late earthquake, the Aurora Borealis, and the south-west wind.” Looker and Wallace, Cincinnati, Ohio.
6.
Johnston, A. C., and Nava, J. S.(1985). “Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid seismic zone.”J. Geophys. Res., 90, 6737–6753.
7.
Harik, I. E., Allen, D. L., Street, R. L., Guo, M., Graves, R. C., Harison, J., and Gawry, M. J. (1993). “Seismic analysis of the Brent-Spence bridge.”Kentucky Transp. Res. Ctr., Rep. No. KTC-93-15, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
8.
Harik, I. E., Allen, D. L., Street, R. L., Guo, M., Graves, R. C., Harison, J., and Gawry, M. J. (1997). “Free and ambient vibration of the Brent-Spence bridge.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(9).
9.
Lam, I. P., Martin, G. R., and Imbsen, R. A. (1990). “Modeling of bridge foundations for seismic design and retrofitting.” Transportation Research Record 1290, 113–126.
10.
Nuttli, O. W.(1973a). “Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations for eastern North America.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 73(2), 519–535.
11.
Nuttli, O. W.(1973b). “The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: intensities, ground motion, and magnitudes.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 63(1), 227–248.
12.
Nuttli, O.(1983). “Average seismic source-parameter relations for mid-plate earthquakes.”J. Geophys. Res., 78(5), 876–885.
13.
Nuttli, O., and Herrmann, R. (1978). “State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States.”Rep. No. 12, Credible Earthquakes for the Central United States, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wtrwy. Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
14.
Standard specifications for highway bridges, 15th Ed. (1992). Am. Assn. of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
15.
Stauder, W. (1982). “Present-day seismicity and identification of active faults in the New Madrid seismic zone.”Investigation of the New Madrid, Missouri, earthquake region; U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Pap. 1236C, 21–30.
16.
Street, R.(1980). “The southern Illinois earthquake of September 27, 1891.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 70(3), 915–920.
17.
Street, R. (1984). “The historical seismicity of the central United States: 1811–1927.”U.S. Geological Rep. #14-08-0001-21251.
18.
Taylor, K. B., Herrmann, R., Hamburger, M., Pallis, G., Johnston, A., Langer, C., and Lam, C.(1989). “The southeastern Illinois earthquake of 10 June, 1987.”Seismological Res. Letters, 60(2), 101–110.
19.
Torro, G. R., Silva, W. J., McGuire, R. K., and Herrmann, R.(1992). “Probabilistic seismic hazard mapping of the Mississippi embayment.”Seismological Res. Letters, 63(3), 449–475.
20.
Westland, A. J.(1940). “A macroseismic study of the Ohio earthquakes of March, 1937.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 30(3), 251–260.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 9 • September 1997
Pages: 1269 - 1275
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1997
Published in print: Sep 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.