Structural Sensitivity as a Measure of Redundancy
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
The conventional definition of redundancy is applicable to skeletal structural systems only, whereas the concept of redundancy has never been discussed in the context of a continuum. Generally, structures in civil engineering constitute a combination of both skeletal and continuum segments. Hence, this paper presents a generalized definition of redundancy that has been defined in terms of structural response sensitivity, which is applicable to both continuum and discrete structures. In contrast to the conventional definition of redundancy, which is assumed to be fixed for a given structure and is believed to be independent of loading and material properties, the new definition would depend on strength and response of the structure at a given stage of its service life. The redundancy measure proposed in this paper is linked to the structural response sensitivities. Thus, the structure can have different degrees of redundancy during its lifetime, depending on the response sensitivity under consideration. It is believed that this new redundancy measure would be more relevant in structural evaluation, damage assessment, and reliability analysis of structures at large.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Feng, Y. S., and Moses, F.(1986). “Optimum design, redundancy and reliability of structural systems.”Comp. and Struct., 24(2), 239–251.
2.
Frangopol, D. M., and Curley, J. P.(1987). “Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113, 1533–1549.
3.
Frangopol, D. M., and Klisinski. (1989). “Weight-strength-redundancy interaction in optimum design of three-dimensional brittle-ductile trusses.”Comp. and Struct., 775–787.
4.
Frangopol, D. M., and Nakib, R. (1989). “Redundancy evaluation of steel girder bridges.”Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, 2171–2178.
5.
Fu, G., and Frangopol, D. M.(1990). “Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework.”Struct. Safety, 7, 165–175.
6.
Fu, G., and Moses, F. (1989). “Probabilistic concepts of redundancy and damage tolerability for structural systems.”Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, 967–974.
7.
Furuta, H., Shinozuka, M., and Yao, J. T. P. (1985). “Probabilistic and fuzzy interpretation of redundancy in structural systems.”Proc., 1st Int. Fuzzy Sys. Assoc. Congr., Spain.
8.
Haftka, R. T., and Adelman, H. M.(1989). “Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis.”Struct. Optimization, 1, 137–151.
9.
Khan, F. R., and El Nimeiri, M. M. (1983). “Effects of structural redundancy and its importance on design criteria for stability and strength.”Developments in tall building, L. S. Beedle, ed., Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., Pa., 421–426.
10.
Kumar, V., Lee, S. J., and German, M. D.(1989). “Finite element design sensitivity analysis and its integration with numerical optimization techniques for structural design.”Comp. and Struct., 32(34), 883–897.
11.
Paliou, C., Shinozuka, M., and Chen, Y. N.(1990). “Reliability and redundancy of offshore structures.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(2), 359–378.
12.
Parmelee, R. A., and Sandberg, H. R. (1987). “If it's redundant, prove it.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, (Oct.), 57–58.
13.
Wang, S., Sun, Y., and Gallagher, R. H.(1985). “Sensitivity analysis in shape optimization of continuum structures.”Comp. and Struct., 20(5), 855–867.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1997
Published in print: Mar 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.