Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 12
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic approach for estimating fragility curves and damage probability matrices for different structural systems. Both fragility curves and damage probability matrices express the probabilities that a structure will sustain different degrees of damage at given ground motion levels. In contrast to previous approaches, this paper presents a method that is based on nonlinear dynamic analysis of the structure rather than on heuristics or on empirical data. The ground motion level for fragility curves is characterized by spectral acceleration. For damage probability matrices, modified Mercalli intensity is used as the ground motion parameter. The probabilities associated with the different damage states at a specified ground motion level are evaluated using the Monte Carlo-simulation technique. The nonstationary autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is used for the generation of earthquake time histories. The approach presented in this paper is used to obtain fragility curves and damage probability matrices for reinforced concrete frames. Three different classes of reinforced concrete frames, based on the number of stories, are considered. Park and Ang's damage index is used to identify the different degrees of damage.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ATC-13: earthquake damage evaluation data for California. (1985). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
2.
Banon, H., Biggs, J. M., and Irvine, H. M.(1981). “Seismic damage in reinforced concrete frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 107(9), 1713–1729.
3.
Bolt, B. A.(1973). “Duration of strong ground motions.”Proc., 5th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., 1, 1304–1313.
4.
Chung, Y. S., Meyer, C., and Shinozuka, M.(1989). “Modeling of concrete damage.”ACI Struct. J., 86(3), 259–271.
5.
Conte, J. P., Pister, K. S., and Mahin, S. A.(1992). “Nonstationary ARMA modeling of seismic motions.”Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 11, 411–426.
6.
Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., and Ramasco, K.(1990). “An evaluation of the use of damage functionals in earthquake-resistant design.”Proc., 9th Eur. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., The Kucherenko Tsniisk of the USSR, Gosstroy, Moscow, 9, 303–312.
7.
De Leon, D., and Ang, A. H-S.(1994). “A damage model for reinforced concrete buildings: further study with the 1985 Mexico City earthquake.”Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3, 2081–2087.
8.
Deodatis, G., and Shinozuka, M.(1989). “Simulation of seismic ground motion using stochastic waves.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 115(12), 2723–2737.
9.
“Development of a standardized earthquake loss-estimation methodology.” (1995). Draft Tech. Manual 100% Submittal, Prepared for Nat. Inst. of Build. Sci., Risk Management Solutions, Inc., Menlo Park, Calif.
10.
DiPasquale, E., and Cakmak, A. S.(1990). “Seismic damage assessment using linear models.”Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 9(4), 194–215.
11.
Galambos, T. V., Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A.(1982). “Probability based load criteria: assessment of current design practice.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(5), 959–977.
12.
Gunturi, S. K. (1992). “Building specific earthquake damage estimation,” PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
13.
Hwang, H. H. M., and Huo, J-R.(1994). “Generation of hazard consistent fragility curves.”Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 13, 345–354.
14.
Hwang, H. H. M., and Jaw, J-W. (1990). “Probabilistic damage analysis of structures.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(7), 1992–2007.
15.
IMSL User's Manual. (1991). The International Mathematical and Statistical Library, IMSL, Inc., Houston, Tex.
16.
Jeong, G. D., and Iwan, W. D.(1988). “The effect of earthquake duration on the damage of structures.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 16, 1201–1211.
17.
Kennedy, R. P., Cornell, C. A., Campbell, R. D., Kaplan, S., and Perla, H. F. (1980). “Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant.”Nuclear Engineering and Design, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Holland, 315–338.
18.
Kennedy, R. P., and Ravindra, M. K. (1984). “Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies.”Nuclear Engineering and Design, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Holland, 47–68.
19.
Kiremidjian, A. S.(1985). “Subjective probabilities for earthquake damage and loss.”Struct. Safety, 2, 309–317.
20.
Kiremidjian, A. S., and Shah, H. C.(1980). “Probabilistic site-dependent response spectra.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 106(1), 69–86.
21.
Krawinkler, H.(1987). “Performance assessment of steel components.”Earthquake Spectra, 3(1), 27–41.
22.
Kunnath, S. K., and Reinhorn, A. M. (1994). “IDARC2D version 3.1: inelastic damage analysis of RC buildings.” Dept. of Civ. Engrg., State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
23.
Liu, S. C., and Jhaveri, D. P. (1969). “Spectral simulation and earthquake site properties.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 95(5), 1145–1168.
24.
MATLAB—system identification toolbox user's guide. (1994). The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Mass.
25.
McCann, M. W., and Shah, H. C.(1979). “Determining strong-motion duration of earthquakes.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 69(4), 1253–1265.
26.
“NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings: part 2—commentary.” (1992). FEMA 223. Earthquake Hazards Reduction Series 65, Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, Washington, D.C.
27.
Park, Y-J., Ang, A. H-S., and Wen, Y. K. (1984). “Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of R.C. buildings.”Struct. Res. Ser. Rep. No. UILU-ENG-84-2007, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
28.
Park, Y-J., and Ang, A. H-S. (1985a). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(4), 722–739.
29.
Park, Y-J., and Ang, A. H-S.(1985b). “Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(4), 740–757.
30.
Park, Y-J., Reinhorn, A. M., and Kunnath, S. K. (1987). “IDARC: inelastic dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete frame-shear-wall structures.”Tech. Rep. NCEER-87-0008, Nat. Ctr. for Earthquake Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, N.Y.
31.
Polhemus, N. W., and Cakmak, A. S.(1981). “Simulation of earthquake ground motions using autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 9, 343–354.
32.
Prakash, V., and Powell, G. H. (1992). DRAIN-2DX: user's guide. Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of California at Berkeley.
33.
Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. (1990). Struct. Engrs. Assn. of California.
34.
Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
35.
Stone, W. C., and Taylor, A. W.(1994). “ISDP: integrated approach to seismic design of reinforced concrete structures.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 120(12), 3548–3566.
36.
Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G.(1975). “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 65(3), 581–626.
37.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1976). “Structural response to earthquakes.”Seismic risk and engineering decisions, C. Lomnitz and E. Rosenblueth, eds., Elsevier Publishing Company Inc., New York, N.Y., 287–337.
38.
Vanmarcke, E. H., and Lai, S-S. P.(1980). “Strong-motion duration and RMS amplitude of earthquake records.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 70(4), 1293–1307.
39.
Yeh, C. H., and Wen, Y. K.(1990). “Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response.”Struct. Safety, 8, 281–298.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.