Seismic Response Control of Bridges by Variable Dampers
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 9
Abstract
This paper discusses a variable damper proposed to control bridge response against an earthquake. The variable damper changes its damping coefficient depending on the structural response so that it functions as a passive energy dissipator, a damper stopper at small deck displacements, and a stopper with shock absorber for excessive deck displacements. The effectiveness of variable dampers is studied first by analytical simulations. It is demonstrated that the peak deck displacement and acceleration are reduced to 26% and 44%, respectively, of the bridge response without control. A prototype variable damper with a maximum damping force of 200 kN is developed, and its effectiveness is studied by a series of dynamic loading tests. A series of shake‐table tests is also performed using a model bridge with a deck weight of 390 kN. It is found that providing the prototype variable damper reduces the deck response acceleration and displacement from 376 cm/s2 and 9.2 cm to 203 cm/s2 and 1.3 cm, respectively. Analytical simulation of the experimental results is made. The predicted deck responses are quite close to the measured ones.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Buckle, I. G., and Mayes, R. L. (1990). “Seismic isolation: history, application and performance—a world view.” Earthquake Spectra, 6(2), 161–201.
2.
Izeki, H. (1979). “Viscous shear stopper.” Prestressed Concrete, Japan Prestressed Concrete Engineering Association, Tokyo, Japan, 21(4), 103–107 (in Japanese).
3.
Japan Road Association. (1990). Seismic design specifications of road bridges. Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
4.
Kawashima, K., and Unjoh, S. (1989). “Development of hybrid control technology.” Civ. Engrg. J., Tokyo, Japan, 32(6), 2–5 (in Japanese).
5.
Kawashima, K., Unjoh, S., Nagashima, H., and Shimizu, H. (1991a). “Current research efforts in Japan for passive and active control of highway bridges against earthquakes.” Proc. 23rd Joint Meeting, U.S.‐Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, Tsukuba, Japan, Spec. Publ. 820, Nat. Inst. of Standards and Technol., Gaithersburg, MD, 187–209.
6.
Kawashima, K., Hasegawa, K., and Nagashima, H. (1991b). “A perspective of Menshin design for highway bridges in Japan.” Proc. U.S.‐Japan Workshop on Earthquake Protective Systems for Bridges: Tech. Rep. NCEER 92‐0004, Nat. Ctr. for Earthquake Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, N.Y.
7.
Kawashima, K., Nagashima, H., and Iwasaki, H. (1993). “Evaluation of modal damping ratio of bridges based on strain energy proportional method.” Proc. 9th U.S.‐Japan Bridge Workshop: Tech. Memo. No. 3230, Public Works Res. Inst., Tsukuba, Japan.
8.
Matsumura, S., Fukuoka, S., Mizumoto, Y., and Nakata, T. (1982). “Seismic design of multispan continuous bridge with use of shear viscous damper.” Bridges and Found., Tokyo, Japan, 31–37 (in Japanese).
9.
Milliken Jr., W. F. (1987). “Lotus active suspension system.” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Experimental Safety Vehicles, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Nat. Hwy. Traffic Safety Admin., Washington, D.C., 467–475.
10.
Robinson, W. H. (1982). “Lead‐rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 10, 593–604.
11.
Sugawara, F. (1986). “Electronically controlled shock absorber system used as a road sensor which utilizes supersonic waves.” Proc. Society of Automotive Engrs., 6.15–6.25.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 13, 1993
Published online: Sep 1, 1994
Published in print: Sep 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.