Bar Yield Penetration in Monotonically Loaded Anchorages
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 3
Abstract
The implications that bar softening has on the design of anchorages in earthquake‐resistant concrete structures are considered. A relatively simple one‐dimensional finite‐element formulation is developed to model the response of anchorages under monotonic displacement control to failure. Resistance mechanisms for the cases with and without bar yield are compared and a rationale is presented to determine the terminal depth of yield penetration. Critical anchorage conditions are examined to establish anticipated demand levels in earthquake‐resisting structures. A parametric study of the sensitivity of anchorage performance to confinement conditions, postyield characteristics of reinforcement, bar size, and available development length was made using the analytical formulation. Trends in performance of yielding anchorages with the variables considered provide information useful for extending design standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. P. (1976). “Measured hysteresis relationships for small‐scale beams.” Struct. Res. Series No. 431, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana, Urbana, Ill.
2.
Alsiwat, J., and Saatcioglu, M. (1992). “Reinforcement anchorage slip under monotonic loading.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(9), 2421–2438.
3.
Bonacci, J. F., and Marquez J. (1994). “Tests of yielding anchorages under monotonic loading.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE 120(3), 987–997.
4.
Bonacci, J. F., and Pantazopoulou, S. (1993). “Parametric investigation of joint mechanics.” ACI Struct. J., 90(1), 61–71.
5.
Building code requirements for reinforced concrete. (1989). Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
6.
Ciampi, V., Eligehausen, R., Bertero, V. V., and Popov, E. P. (1982). “Analytical model for concrete anchorage of reinforcing bars under generalized excitations.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC‐82/23, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
7.
Eligehausen, R., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1983). “Local bond stress‐slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC‐83/23, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
8.
Filippou, F. C., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1983). “Modeling of R/C joints under cyclic excitations.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 109(11), 2666–2684.
9.
Filippou, F. C. (1986). “A simple model for reinforcing bar anchorages under cyclic excitations.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(7), 1639–1659.
10.
Kitayama, K., Otani, S., and Aoyama, H. (1991). “Development of design criteria for RC interior beam‐column joints.” Design of beam‐column joints for seismic resistance: SP‐123, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
11.
Moehle, J. P. (1992). “Displacement‐based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes.” Earthq. Spectra, 8(3), 403–428.
12.
Mukaddam, M., and Kasti, M. B. (1986). “Reinforced concrete joints under cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(4), 937–942.
13.
Ngo, D., and Scordelis, A. C. (1967). “Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams.” J. Amer. Concr. Inst., 64(3), 152–163.
14.
Orangun, C. O., Jirsa, J. O., and Breen, J. E. (1975). “The strength of anchored bars: a reevaluation of test data on development lengths and splices.” Res. Rep. No. 154‐1, Center for Highway Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
15.
Otani, S., Kobayashi, Y., and Aoyama, H. (1984). “Reinforced concrete interior beam‐column joints under simulated earthquake loading.” U.S.‐N.Z.‐Japan Seminar on Design of Reinforced Concr. Beam‐Column Joints, Monterey, Calif.
16.
Russo, G., Zingone, G., and Romano, F. (1990). “Analytical solution for bondslip of reinforcing bars in RC joints.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 336–355.
17.
Sozen, M. A., and Moehle, J. P. (1990). “A study of experimental data on development and lap‐splice lengths for deformed reinforcing bars in concrete.” Rep. Portland Cement Assoc. and Concrete Reinforcing Steel Inst., S & M Partnership, Urbana, Ill.
18.
Stocker, M. F., and Sozen, M. A. (1970). “Investigation of prestressed concrete for highway bridges, part v: bond characteristics of prestressing strand.” Engrg. Experiment Sta. Bull. 503, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana, Urbana, Ill.
19.
Suggested development, splice, and standard hook provisions for deformed bars in concrete. (1990). Committee 408, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
20.
Ueda, T., Lin., I., and Hawkins N. M. (1986). “Beam bar anchorage in exterior column‐beam connections.” J. ACI, 83(3), 412–422.
21.
Viwathanatepa, S., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1979). “Effects of generalized loadings on bond of reinforcing bars embedded in confined concrete blocks.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC‐79/22, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 3 • March 1994
Pages: 965 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 23, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1994
Published in print: Mar 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.