Seismic Behavior of Plain‐ and Reinforced‐Masonry Buildings
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of an experimental study that investigated the seismic behavior of two three‐story, plain‐ and reinforced‐masonry buiding models with identical structural configuration. The measured response and observed mechanism of structural behavior have been used to analyze the load‐bearing and energy‐dissipation capacity of each structural type. By reinforcing the masonry walls with vertical reinforcement at the borders of the walls and horizontal reinforcement in the mortar bed joints, the lateral resistance, energy‐dissipation capacity, and global ductility of the building was significantly improved. The mechanism of the behavior of the tested models changed from the story mechanism that prevailed in the case of the plain‐masonry model to coupled shear‐wall mechanism in the case of reinforced‐masonry building model, with floor slabs and bond beams contributing to the seismic resistance of the model in the latter case.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. P. (1988). “Dynamic and static testing of reinforced concrete masonry structures.” The Masonry Soc. J., 7(1), T18–T22.
2.
Bertero, V., and Uang, C. M. (1992). “Issues and future directions in the use of an energy approach for seismic resistant design of structures.” Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, England, 3–22.
3.
“Common unified rules for structures in seismic regions.” (1988). Eurocode 8, Report EUR 8850 EN, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
4.
Housner, G. W. (1959). “Behavior of structures during earthquakes.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 85(4), 109–129.
5.
Krawinkler, H., and Nassar, A. A. (1992). “Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities.” Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, England, 23–39.
6.
Moroni, M. O., Astroza, M., and Gomez, J. (1992). “Seismic force reduction factors for masonry buildings.” Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., 8, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 4521–4524.
7.
Noland, J. L. (1991). “U.S. coordinated program for masonry building research. Progress report.” Proc. 9th Int. Brick/Block Masonry Conf., German Masonry Society, Bonn, Germany, 520–527.
8.
“Technical norms for structures in seismic zones.” (1986). Decreto Ministeriale 24/1/86, Official Gazette of Republic of Italy, Rome, Italy (in Italian).
9.
“Technical norms for the design and construction of masonry.” (1987). Decreto Ministeriale 9/1/87, Official Gazette of Republic of Italy, Rome, Italy (in Italian).
10.
Tomaževič, M. Modena, C., Velechovsky, T., and Weiss, P. (1990). “The influence of structural layout and reinforcement on the seismic behavior of masonry buildings: An experimental study.” The Masonry Soc. J., 9(1), 26–50.
11.
Tomaževič, M., and Velechovsky, T. (1992). “Some aspects of testing small‐scale masonry building models on simple earthquake simulators.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 21(11), 945–963.
12.
Yamazaki, Y., Seible, F., Mizuno, H., Kaminosono, T., and Teshigawara, M. (1988). “The Japanese 5‐story full scale reinforced concrete masonry test—Forced vibration and cyclic load test results.” The Masonry Soc. J., 7(1), T1–T17.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 30, 1992
Published online: Feb 1, 1994
Published in print: Feb 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.