Structural Failures and Engineering Ethics
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 5
Abstract
Major engineering failures act as a catalyst for change in standards of practice and therefore create the opportunity for establishing better ethical practices for the profession. When examining ethics in engineering practice, it is useful to make the distinction between ethics in engineering and ethics of engineering. Ethics in engineering deals with the ethics of actions of individual engineers. Ethics of engineering deals with ethical issues that involve the role of engineers in industry, the ethics of the organizations in which they work and of professional engineering societies, and the ethical responsibilities of the profession. This paper presents case studies of two major structural disasters—the 1907 Quebec Bridge collapse and the 1981 Kansas City, Mo. Hyatt Regency walkway failure. The effect of each failure on engineering ethics is examined from the viewpoint of both ethics in engineering and of ethics of engineering. In response to failures, engineers need to change professional procedures and practices so that they reinforce, rather than place obstacles in the way of, moral action.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beckley, R. A. (1982). “Keep government out of failures.” Engrg. News‐Record, 208(16), 12.
2.
“Building failures—Preventing them, learning from them.” (1982). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 52(1), 44–51.
3.
“Compression members in the Quebec and the Forth bridges.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 341–342.
4.
Cooper, T. (1906). “New facts about eye‐bars.” Proc., ASCE, 32, 14–31.
5.
Dahlem, B. A. (1982). “Inspection is no solution.” Engrg. News‐Record, 208(24), 11.
6.
DeGeorge, R. T. (1986). Business Ethics. 2nd Ed., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
7.
Deutsch, J. B. (1985). “Missouri Board of Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors vs. Daniel M. Duncan, Jack D. Gillum, and G. C. E. International, Inc.: Statement of the case, findings of fact, conclusions of law and decisions.” Case No. AR‐84‐0239, Administrative Hearing Commission, Jefferson City, Mo., Nov.
8.
“Editorial.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 339.
9.
“The fall of the Quebec cantilever bridge.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 258–264.
10.
Final report and recommendations on assignment of authority and responsibility for design of steel structures. (1985). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
11.
Giroux, Y. M., Picard, A., and Beaulieu, D. (1987). “Historique des Liens Routiers et Ferroviaires entre les Rives du St'Laurent a Quebec.” Proc. CSCE Centennial Conf., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, 2(II), 701–731 (in French).
12.
“The greatest engineering disaster.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 256–257.
13.
Haines, D. W. (1983). “Forensic engineering: What role for ASCE.” Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 53(7), 53–55.
14.
“Hotel disaster triggers probes.” (1981). Engrg. News‐Record, 207(4), 10–11.
15.
“Hyatt engineers ‘guilty’ of negligence.” (1985). Engrg. News‐Record, 215(21), 10–12.
16.
Leonards, G. A. (1983). “Forum: Collapse of the Hyatt Regency walkways—Implications.” Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 53(3), 6.
17.
Marshall, R. D., Pfrang, E. O., Leyendecker, E. V., and Woodward, K. A. (1982). Investigation of the Kansas City Hyatt Regency walkways collapse. Nat. Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., May.
18.
Petroski, H. (1982). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. St. Martin's Press, New York, N.Y.
19.
“Pfrang named ASCE executive director.” (1983). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 53(7), 8.
20.
Quality in the constructed project. (1990). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
21.
“The Quebec bridge failure: Our deficient knowledge of the strength of large columns.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 284–286.
22.
Quebec Bridge inquiry. (1908). Royal Commission of Inquiry, King's Printer, Ottawa, Ontario.
23.
Roddis, W. M. K. (1987). “How a profession learns from failure: The Kansas City Hyatt Regency collapse.” SWE Nat. Conf. 87, Society of Women Engineers, 271–278.
24.
Roddis, W. M. K. (1991). “The 1907 Quebec Bridge collapse: A case study in engineering ethics.” Nat. Steel Constr. Conf., American Institute of Steel Construction, 23‐1–23‐11.
25.
Ross, S. S. (1984). Construction disasters: Design failures, causes and prevention. McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
26.
Salmon, C. G., and Johnson, J. E. (1990). Steel structures: Design and behavior. 3rd Ed., Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.
27.
Sawyer, D. A., and Lewis, T. (1981). “A Hyatt puzzle solution.” Engrg. News‐Record, 207(16), 29.
28.
Stevens, R. G. (1981). “Hyatt puzzle.” Engrg. News‐Record, 207(12), 8–9.
29.
“Structural failures.” (1981). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 51(12), 42–45.
30.
“Structural failures: new mechanism for feeding information to the profession.” (1982). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 52(10), 17.
31.
Tarkov, J. (1986). “A disaster in the making.” American heritage of invention and tech., 1(3), 10–17.
32.
“Theodore Cooper on the Quebec bridge and its failure.” (1907). Engrg. News, 58(10), 473–477.
33.
“Walkway probes continue.” (1981). Engrg. News‐Record, 207(6), 16.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 5 • May 1993
Pages: 1539 - 1555
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 9, 1991
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.